Opened 16 years ago

Closed 16 years ago

Last modified 13 years ago

#7378 closed (fixed)

Reverse relationship ignores to_field (in another setting)

Reported by: mturtle@… Owned by: Jacob
Component: Database layer (models, ORM) Version: dev
Severity: Keywords: qsrf-cleanup
Cc: Triage Stage: Unreviewed
Has patch: no Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no


This is related to bug #4510. I am using the latest version from SVN (r7574), and a similar error is happening. Basically, the reverse relationship ignores the to_field when I use it directly as a property (although the example in #4510 using it in a filter works fine).

If I have these models:

class Place(models.Model):
    unique_but_not_primary_field = models.IntegerField(unique=True)

class Franchise(models.Model):
    place = models.ForeignKey(Place, to_field='unique_but_not_primary_field')

And I enter this code:

>>> new_york = Place(unique_but_not_primary_field=1000)
>>> mcdonalds = Franchise()
>>> = new_york
>>> print new_york.franchise_set.all()
>>> print django.db.connection.queries[-1]['sql']
SELECT `cms_franchise`.`id`, `cms_franchise`.`place_id` FROM `cms_franchise` INNER JOIN `cms_place` ON (`cms_franchise`.`place_id` = `cms_place`.`unique_but_not_primary_field`) WHERE `cms_place`.`id` = 1000 

It is still doing the join on the primary key, not the to_field.

As far as I can tell, the problem is in django/db/models/fields/ on line 322:

manager.core_filters = {'%s__pk' % getattr(instance, rel_field.rel.get_related_field().attname)}

I changed this line to the following, and it works perfectly for me:

manager.core_filters = {'%s__%s' % (, rel_field.rel.get_related_field().attname): getattr(instance, rel_field.rel.get_related_field().attname)}

Change History (5)

comment:1 by Jacob, 16 years ago

Owner: changed from nobody to Jacob
Status: newassigned

comment:2 by George Vilches, 16 years ago

Keywords: qsrf-cleanup added

comment:3 by Jacob, 16 years ago

milestone: 1.0

comment:4 by Malcolm Tredinnick, 16 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

(In [7785]) Fixed #7378 -- Use the "to_field" where appropriate on reverse relations.

Patch from mturtle@…. The remaining uses of "%spk" in
fields/ all look safe, since they are for many-to-many fields, which
doesn't take "to_field" as a parameter.

comment:5 by Jacob, 13 years ago

milestone: 1.0

Milestone 1.0 deleted

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top