Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#6521 closed (wontfix)
add a "name" parameter to test client get() and post() methods
Reported by: | Will Hardy | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Testing framework | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Keywords: | ||
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Design decision needed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Allow named url patterns to be entered directly into the test client's get()
and post()
methods for the sake of readability and to encourage use of named url paths.
For example, instead of:
url = reverse('poll_edit', args=(24,)) response = client.get(url)
It would become:
response = client.get(name='poll_edit', args=(24,))
This may of course conflict with the direct passing of extra header information to get()
and post()
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
comment:2 by , 17 years ago
Component: | Uncategorized → Unit test system |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Design decision needed |
Interesting idea
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I'm afraid I don't see the benefit here. client.get() has a very clear and obvious API - it takes a URL. reverse() has a very clear and obvious API - it takes a name, and turns it into a URL. This change would require you to munge the API of client.get() and add a whole lot of messy error checking just so you can avoid typing 4 characters. This seems like a false economy to me.
I can write the tests and a patch if people think this idea is worthwhile.