Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
#3826 closed (wontfix)
`{% with %}` template tag
| Reported by: | Chris Beaven | Owned by: | Adrian Holovaty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Template system | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Keywords: | ||
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Design decision needed | |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Following on from the related discussion, here's a ticket for the {% with %} tag.
Attachments (2)
Change History (7)
by , 19 years ago
| Attachment: | with_tag.patch added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Ready for checkin |
|---|
ready-for-checkin as per discussion on django-dev.
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
by , 19 years ago
| Attachment: | with_template_tag.patch added |
|---|
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
| Patch needs improvement: | set |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | fixed |
| Status: | closed → reopened |
To use the with tag for more than one variable I need to nest the tags as follow:
{% with var1 as name1 %}
{% with var2 as name2 %}
{% with var3 as name 3 %}
...
{% endwith %}
{% endwith %}
{% endwith %}
This is ugly, cost much typing and can be such confusing, I've done a patch to use one with tag to many variables I want to define, see:
{% with var1 as name1 and var2 as name2 and var3 as name3 %}
...
{% endwith %}
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
| Patch needs improvement: | unset |
|---|---|
| Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin → Design decision needed |
Michelts, I'll leave this ticket open, but in the future if you are suggesting enhancement to something that has already been fixed then please open a new ticket.
comment:5 by , 19 years ago
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
The more compact form is not greatly more readable. Let's leave it as nested tags.
with tests and docs