#376 closed enhancement (wontfix)
Add a handler for mod_python v. 2 (Django requires v. 3)
Reported by: | Manuzhai | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | yes | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I've adapted the mod_python handler to also work on mod_python 2. The differences with the mod_python 3 are fairly small, but it's still somewhat incompatible. In addition, I think you need an index.py file to make it work with the '/' URL given to a basic address. Here's the config I'm using, I'll attach modpython2.py.
<Location /> SetHandler python-program AddHandler python-program .py DirectoryIndex index.py PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython2 PythonPath "['/home/dirkjan/dev'] + sys.path" PythonInterpreter weblog.main PythonDebug On SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE weblog.settings.main </Location>
Attachments (7)
Change History (28)
by , 19 years ago
Attachment: | modpython2.py added |
---|
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
index.py doesn't actually need to contain anything; touch index.py
will do.
There is currently a problem with the Admin interface complaining that it doesn't recognize index.py. This can be fixed by loosening the regex for djano.views.admin.main.index
to ''
instead of '^$'
.
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
Okay, seems there's a problem with the cookie support in the handler, I'll investigate it.
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
Very cool, Manuzhai -- thanks! Let us know when you think it's stable (cookie support, etc.), and we'll roll it in.
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
Component: | Admin interface → Core framework |
---|---|
Type: | defect → enhancement |
Hey Manuzhai, about cookie support for mod_python 2.7 , check this url:
http://www.modpython.org/FAQ/faqw.py?req=show&file=faq05.009.htp
That should deal with the cookie/session issues.
comment:5 by , 19 years ago
Good point! Unfortunately, the box where I was developing this has gone MIA, and I'm not sure whether I'll be able to test this on another server.
comment:6 by , 19 years ago
Summary: | Handler for mod_python 2 → Add a handler for mod_python v. 2 (Django requires v. 3) |
---|
Please reopen when you've got the
comment:7 by , 19 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Please reopen when you've got this working.
comment:8 by , 18 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Needs tests: | set |
Version: | → 0.95 |
I tweaked Manuzhai ideas into 0.95. As far as I could test, it works fine on apache 1.3.x and mod_python 2.x, including admin interface.
Please, if you find problems, post them here, so I can track them.
comment:9 by , 18 years ago
Needs documentation: | set |
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | set |
Resolution: | invalid |
Status: | closed → reopened |
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
Reopening this because it seems to have a champion. However, the patch is not acceptable, as it's based on our modpython.py
handler from a long time ago. That handler has changed since then, and this patch will need to incorporate those changes. For example, ModPythonRequest.__repr__()
has changed, and settings.ENABLE_PSYCO
no longer exists.
I'd suggest starting with the current django/core/handlers/modpython.py
and tweaking it to making the mod_python version 2 changes.
by , 18 years ago
Attachment: | modpython2_svn.py added |
---|
Synced mod_python 2.x changes with latest svn code
comment:10 by , 18 years ago
Needs documentation: | unset |
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
Version: | 0.95 → SVN |
Tweaked to reflect latest svn code, as requested.
Btw. issue with '/' at the end of url is resolved, and now it will behave as in mod_python 3.x case :)
comment:11 by , 18 years ago
What's the status of this? Is it going to be supported in the core? It solved my problem with a host using Apache 1.3.37 and mod_python 2.7.11. I think I've convinced them to upgrade to Apache 2.x and mod_python 3.x, but in the meantime this works nicely.
I don't like being out of synch with the Django trunk, however.
comment:12 by , 18 years ago
Please don't ask "when will this be merged in" questions in this ticket tracker; it increases the amount of noise developers have to wade through while evaluating tickets. The appropriate venue for this sort of discussion is the mailing list.
comment:13 by , 18 years ago
The changes in the latest synced mod_python v.2 version vs. the mod_python v.3 handler in SVN look very small. Is there any way to determine the mod_python version at runtime, so that the v.2 handler and the v.3 handler could be merged? At worst, either through configuration in Django settings, or just trying the v.3 method and using the v.2 method on an exception? I think that if they were in the same file, the v.2 version would be less likely to bit-rot.
I'm not able to test this currently, as I don't have an Apache 1.3/mod_python 2.x installation available, but I expect to soon.
by , 17 years ago
Attachment: | django-modpython.patch added |
---|
Universal mod_python (2.x, 3.x) handler, synced with svn code.
comment:14 by , 17 years ago
Hello. I've attached patch for current svn mod_python handler. With patch hadler works with both (2.x, 3.x) version of mod_python. Have tested it on my home server - Apache 2.0.58, mod_python 3.2.10; and on remote hosting - apache 1.3.37, mod_python 2.7.11. Although i need more time to check stability.
by , 17 years ago
Attachment: | django-modpython.2.patch added |
---|
Universal mod_python (2.x, 3.x) handler, synced with svn code (with ap_auth_type and user for mod_python2.x).
comment:15 by , 17 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
Ticket looks pretty good! Could probably use some inline comments whenever code has been reverted to be mod_python 2 compatible.
comment:16 by , 17 years ago
Triage Stage: | Design decision needed → Accepted |
---|
I'd like to get more testing done on this patch since it's a pretty damn critical area, but the idea's fine in theory. Marking accepted.
by , 17 years ago
Attachment: | django-modpython2-support.patch added |
---|
Updated patch for revision 7020
comment:17 by , 17 years ago
Altought the ticket is marked as Accepted (in 2007), the latest release of mod_python 2 was in 2004.
Are we really willing to maintain support for it? (Altough it seem somebody is using this, or at least was 6 months ago).
comment:18 by , 17 years ago
Still using (and maintaining) the patch because we can't move to Apache2 right now. Patch is valid for the trunk head. But if nobody other uses it feel free to close the ticket.
comment:19 by , 17 years ago
-1 for including this, mod_python 2 should really not be officially supported. Andrew, perhaps you can upload your patch to djangosnippets and close the ticket?
comment:20 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Closing because mod_python 2 is old.
comment:21 by , 16 years ago
If one really needs to use Apache 1.3, then one can use mod_wsgi instead anyway as it supports that version of Apache.
Handler for mod_python2. Hasn't been tested extensively.