Opened 20 months ago

Closed 20 months ago

Last modified 20 months ago

#34048 closed Cleanup/optimization (needsinfo)

Do not add cache control header if is set to false or a falsy value

Reported by: Wiktor Owned by: Wiktor
Component: Utilities Version: dev
Severity: Normal Keywords: cache control
Cc: Wiktor, Jan Urban, Flavio Curella Triage Stage: Unreviewed
Has patch: yes Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description (last modified by Wiktor)

Currently when one sets no_cache to a falsy value, e.g.:

@cache_control(no_cache=False)
def some_view()
    pass

Cache-Control header will be set to no_cache=False.

This might be confusing and might lead to a security issue.

Instead it should be just excluded.

Change History (9)

comment:2 by Wiktor, 20 months ago

Description: modified (diff)

comment:3 by Wiktor, 20 months ago

Cc: Wiktor added
Has patch: set

comment:4 by Jan Urban, 20 months ago

Cc: Jan Urban added
Triage Stage: UnreviewedAccepted
Type: BugCleanup/optimization

comment:5 by Mariusz Felisiak, 20 months ago

Cc: Flavio Curella added

comment:6 by Wiktor, 20 months ago

Owner: changed from nobody to Wiktor
Status: newassigned

comment:7 by Jan Urban, 20 months ago

This ticket is about avoiding the possible misunderstanding of how no-cache works in browser.
This ticket should not change the functionality of no-cache header and the end result of the patch_cache_control and how the header is interpreted. (As far as I know)

Needs more verification and discussion, if we should lead the hand of others.
As mentioned as it could be security issue as well if the value is interpreted wrongly by the others.

I do not know how exactly the no-cache works and what are the conventions for it and best practice, but this sounded like it make it more explicit.

comment:8 by Mariusz Felisiak, 20 months ago

Resolution: needsinfo
Status: assignedclosed
Triage Stage: AcceptedUnreviewed

Closing as "needsinfo" as I'm not sure how this can create a security issue and why False should be treated differently. True always takes precedence over other values, so passing False will not override. On the other hand when no-cache is not set to True than the value is cast to string and added to the list of field names. Please provide more details.

comment:9 by Wiktor, 20 months ago

Setting

no_cache = False
cache_control(no_cache=no_cache) 

will end up creating header

Cache-Control: no-cache=False

which is not intuitive and might lead to an unexpected caching behavior (thus I mentioned potential security issue). What I'd expect is an empty Cache-Control.

Cache-Control:  


More context about no-cache could be found in RFC: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7234#section-5.2.2.2

The "no-cache" response directive indicates that the response MUST
NOT be used to satisfy a subsequent request without successful
validation on the origin server. This allows an origin server to
prevent a cache from using it to satisfy a request without contacting
it, even by caches that have been configured to send stale responses.
[...]

For True it works as expected (it just adds Cache-Control: no-cache).

What do you suggest in that case? I understand that maybe the behavior should be changed for all the keyword arguments (True - turn them on, False - turn them off), however I find no-cache more sensitive.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top