#25175 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Create an alias for the postgresql_psycopg2 database backend
Reported by: | Baptiste Mispelon | Owned by: | Caio Ariede |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | 1.8 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
The name is too complicated and personally, I can never get it right the first time.
In the discussion on the mailing list [1], it was suggested to actually create two aliases: postgresql
and postgres
. I have no preference one way or the other.
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-developers/o7qFItlHILc
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
As all other database names are named according to their database, I agree with Aymeric that postgresql is a better name.
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | set |
Please don't forget to check "Has patch" so the ticket appears in the review queue.
As I mentioned on the pull request, I think we could leave the alias without an immediate deprecation. Mainly because I don't want to have to vary the settings on Jenkins (which are used for multiple versions of Django) based on the Django version. I guess it would save third-party apps some hassle too.
Given that Postgres was renamed to PostgreSQL a few years ago, I think that
postgresql
is a better name.