#23390 closed Uncategorized (duplicate)
Clicking on the Add Group + in an Auth User's change-view results in a 400
| Reported by: | Michael Angeletti | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | contrib.admin | Version: | 1.7-rc-3 |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | auth, admin |
| Cc: | Michael Angeletti | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Using Django 1.7c3 with everything default on a brand new project, I visited a user's change-view in the admin, clicked the + next to Groups (since there are none by default), and was taken to the following URL in a popup window: http://127.0.0.1:8000/admin/auth/group/add/?_to_field=id&_popup=1. The _to_field param causes Django to return a Bad Request (400) response.
Attachments (2)
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Hi @bmispelon,
I've just reproduced the issue on a different admin page (haven't tried on the User page) with Django stable/1.7.x (@267b121), as well as a different error with master. I've attached a screenshot of each, containing the URL and the result. I wasn't sure if it'd be appropriate to reopen the ticket that you marked this a duplicate as, since it appears the issue therein has been fixed, while this issue is maybe due to something different.
Thanks
Michael
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
| Resolution: | duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → new |
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Can you check if #23431 solves your issue? If not, we'll need more details about your models, etc. so we can reproduce it.
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
I'm pretty confident this a duplicate of #23431 caused by the auto_created hidden relationship between User and Group.
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
@charettes @timgraham - #23431 did not solve the issue, as noted in my comment above.
comment:7 by , 10 years ago
#23431 was committed after your comment 2 days ago. Did you recheck since then? If so, please provide models to reproduce.
comment:8 by , 10 years ago
@timgraham
Thanks for the reply. The issue is indeed fixed. I really appreciate your last comment, because yes I had updated just a couple days before the commit was merged, apparently.
Michael
Hi,
The bug does appear on 1.7c3 but it's been fixed on the latest
stable/1.7.xbranch.Bisecting points to 3cbb7590cb0ece38f665b516db30cd5a9431f8c8 so it looks like this issue is a duplicate of #23329.
If that's not the case, please reopen.
Thanks.