#22260 closed Bug (fixed)
Custom model field: field.db_type not called for (initial) migration / docs wrong? (DurationField)
Reported by: | Daniel Hahler | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Migrations | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | yes | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
While trying to use the DurationField with Django 1.7 I have noticed that the field is silently ignored from being added to the database.
While the initial migration is correct, the lookup for the db field type fails.
The docs state:
The db_type() method is called by Django when the framework constructs the CREATE TABLE statements for your application – that is, when you first create your tables.
This does not appear to be the case with migrations however, which only call field.db_parameters
:
…/django-master/django/db/migrations/executor.py(60)migrate()
58 for migration, backwards in plan:
59 if not backwards:
---> 60 self.apply_migration(migration, fake=fake)
61 else:
62 self.unapply_migration(migration, fake=fake)
…/django-master/django/db/migrations/executor.py(95)apply_migration()
93 import ipdb; ipdb.set_trace()
94 project_state = self.loader.graph.project_state((migration.app_label, migration.name), at_end=False)
---> 95 migration.apply(project_state, schema_editor)
96 # For replacement migrations, record individual statuses
97 if migration.replaces:
…/django-master/django/db/migrations/migration.py(97)apply()
95 operation.state_forwards(self.app_label, new_state)
96 # Run the operation
---> 97 operation.database_forwards(self.app_label, schema_editor, project_state, new_state)
98 # Switch states
99 project_state = new_state
…/django-master/django/db/migrations/operations/models.py(28)database_forwards()
26 model = apps.get_model(app_label, self.name)
27 if router.allow_migrate(schema_editor.connection.alias, model):
---> 28 schema_editor.create_model(model)
29
30 def database_backwards(self, app_label, schema_editor, from_state, to_state):
…/django-master/django/db/backends/schema.py(191)create_model()
189 for field in model._meta.local_fields:
190 # SQL
--> 191 definition, extra_params = self.column_sql(model, field)
192 if definition is None:
193 continue
…/django-master/django/db/backends/schema.py(108)column_sql()
106 """
107 # Get the column's type and use that as the basis of the SQL
--> 108 db_params = field.db_parameters(connection=self.connection)
109 sql = db_paramstype
110 params = []
From the initial migration:
('runtime', durationfield.db.models.fields.duration.DurationField(help_text=u'Format: HH:MM:SS', null=True, verbose_name=u'Playtime')),
Commit e5983af (from 2012) changed BaseDatabaseSchemaEditor from using db_type
to db_parameters
.
(In commit 1a9f13d the documentation got improved somehow, but appears to still reflect not the new/different behavior using migrations).
I have filed an issue for django-durationfield.
The source for the custom model field: duration.py.
Let me know if I should provide a simple test case / test app.
While at it, I think that there should have been a warning or assertion being triggered in this case. I have seen that the code considers this case to be a m2m field (or something similar), but those might look different at that point - and an assertion could be made there.
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
The commit introducing db_parameters
(mentioned above, but linked incorrectly) is https://github.com/django/django/commit/ca9c3cd.
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Needs tests: | set |
Pull request at: https://github.com/django/django/pull/2425.
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
The fix for this is now in the pull request for #22001.
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | duplicate → fixed |
---|
This seems related to #22001.