Opened 13 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#18599 closed Bug (fixed)
GenericForeignKey field can't be set on init of model
| Reported by: | dpantele | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | contrib.contenttypes | Version: | 1.4 |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | dpantele | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
If we are trying to set GenericForeignKey to non-saved object during model initialization, it is not set.
For example:
class A(models.model):
pass
class B(models.model):
object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField()
content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType)
obj = generic.GenericForeignKey()
...
a = A()
b = B(obj=a)
b.obj # None
b.obj.save() # 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'save'
Attachments (1)
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
| Summary: | GenericForeignKey field can't be set on init of moel → GenericForeignKey field can't be set on init of model |
|---|
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
|---|
comment:3 by , 13 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
It is very strange that any object which is passed to the constructor is thrown away. In FK situation I can do like that:
>>> a = A() >>> b = B(fk=a) >>> b.fk.save() >>> b.fk_id = b.fk.id >>> b.save()
In the GFK situation it is not possible for me to save b object if i don't pass a. So, I should everywhere pass two references or use an explicit notation:
>>> a = A() >>> b = B() >>> b.gfk = a >>> b.gfk.save() >>> b.gfk = b.gfk >>> b.save()
Of course, it should be possible to keep reference to non-saved object. For example, I need to validate object 'b', and if it is not valid, I should not save 'a' object at all.
I see very simple way of solving this problem: we should keep cached object not in object instance, but in the field instance.
by , 12 years ago
| Attachment: | 18599-test.patch added |
|---|
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
See also #16508, as this is a common problem of virtual fields (implementation of GenericForeignKey).
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
This was fixed in 8a47ba679d2da0dee74671a53ba0cd918b433e34. PR to add the test.
comment:8 by , 10 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
The cause is very simple: GenericForeignKey.instance_pre_init extracts the content-type and the id of the related object and then throws the object itself away. If an unsaved object is passed in the constructor, its id is None, so the pointer to the object is lost at this point.
Here's what happens with a GFK:
>>> a = A() >>> b = B(obj=a) >>> b.obj >>> b.content_type <ContentType: a> >>> b.object_id >>> b.save() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 1, in <module> File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/base.py", line 479, in save force_update=force_update, update_fields=update_fields) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/base.py", line 574, in save_base result = manager._insert([self], fields=fields, return_id=update_pk, using=using, raw=raw) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/manager.py", line 203, in _insert return insert_query(self.model, objs, fields, **kwargs) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/query.py", line 1589, in insert_query return query.get_compiler(using=using).execute_sql(return_id) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 914, in execute_sql cursor.execute(sql, params) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/backends/util.py", line 42, in execute return self.cursor.execute(sql, params) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py", line 340, in execute return Database.Cursor.execute(self, query, params) IntegrityError: test_app_b.object_id may not be NULLIn comparison here's what happens with a regular FK:
>>> a = A() >>> b = B(fk=a) >>> b.fk <A: A object> >>> b.save() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 1, in <module> File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/base.py", line 479, in save force_update=force_update, update_fields=update_fields) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/base.py", line 574, in save_base result = manager._insert([self], fields=fields, return_id=update_pk, using=using, raw=raw) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/manager.py", line 203, in _insert return insert_query(self.model, objs, fields, **kwargs) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/query.py", line 1589, in insert_query return query.get_compiler(using=using).execute_sql(return_id) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 914, in execute_sql cursor.execute(sql, params) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/backends/util.py", line 42, in execute return self.cursor.execute(sql, params) File "/Users/myk/Documents/dev/django-trunk/django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py", line 340, in execute return Database.Cursor.execute(self, query, params) IntegrityError: test_app_b.fk_id may not be NULLIn both cases, saving the B object will fail because the A object doesn't have an id yet, so there isn't much to gain in "fixing" this.
We should probably just raise an exception in this situation.