models Meta's db_table and ManyToManyField
|Reported by:||ctao||Owned by:|
|Component:||Database layer (models, ORM)||Version:||1.3-alpha|
|Has patch:||no||Needs documentation:||no|
|Needs tests:||no||Patch needs improvement:||no|
Given both models as follows:
class P(AuditModel): description = models.CharField(max_length=50, unique=True) class Meta: db_table = 'P' class XSummary(AuditModel): p = models.ManyToManyField(P, blank = True, null = True, ) class Meta: db_table = 'Summary'
The 2 models with cutomized db_table name will generate a relationship table as follows:
CREATE TABLE "SUMMARY_P" ( "ID" NUMBER(11) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, "XSUMMARY_ID" NUMBER(11) NOT NULL, "P_ID" NUMBER(11) NOT NULL REFERENCES "P" ("ID") DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED, ) ;
Now you can see that the table name "SUMMARY_P" combined the cutomized db_table name of both models. But the field "XSUMMARY_ID" still take the mode name -- "XSUMMARY", not the db_table "SUMMARY". Franckly, I would like to have the field "XSUMMARY_ID" as "field "SUMMARY_ID".
Any feedback or fix on the issue ?
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by russellm
- Needs documentation unset
- Needs tests unset
- Patch needs improvement unset
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from new to closed