Opened 17 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#9995 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Mention 'pip install Django' as an alternative installation method.
| Reported by: | daveyjoe | Owned by: | Aymeric Augustin | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Documentation | Version: | 1.0 | 
| Severity: | Release blocker | Keywords: | easy_install, docs, documentation, install, installation, setup | 
| Cc: | paul.collins.iii@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted | 
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no | 
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | yes | 
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no | 
Description
Now that there are no issues with easy_install Django, I think that it should be mentioned as an alternative method of install on the docs.
Attachments (3)
Change History (14)
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | install_with_setuptools.diff added | 
|---|
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
| Summary: | Mention 'easy_install Django' as an alternative method installation method. → Mention 'easy_install Django' as an alternative installation method. | 
|---|
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | install_with_setuptools-2.diff added | 
|---|
comment:2 by , 17 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted | 
|---|
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin | 
|---|
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
| Patch needs improvement: | set | 
|---|---|
| Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin → Accepted | 
I think at least one BDFL would argue that pip is a more important (perhaps exclusively so) inclusion -- 
"Really, you shouldn’t be using easy_install any more — please switch to pip." [1]
I suggest amending this to include both, or pip only.
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
| Severity: | → Normal | 
|---|---|
| Summary: | Mention 'easy_install Django' as an alternative installation method. → Mention 'pip install Django' as an alternative installation method. | 
| Type: | → New feature | 
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
| Easy pickings: | unset | 
|---|---|
| UI/UX: | unset | 
#16471 was a duplicate. It has a list of references to easy_install and pip in the current docs.
by , 14 years ago
| Attachment: | easy_install_2_pip.patch added | 
|---|
something to kick off the discussion again (missed an _ last time)
comment:8 by , 14 years ago
| Cc: | added | 
|---|
comment:9 by , 14 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to | 
|---|---|
| Severity: | Normal → Release blocker | 
| Type: | New feature → Cleanup/optimization | 
This is tightly linked to #9112 which is a release blocker. For the sake of clarity, I'm marking this ticket as a release blocker too.
comment:10 by , 14 years ago
While I totally agree this needs to be done, we shouldn't recommend installing the python-pip package as it is incredibly out of date on most distributions.
Instead I'd suggest to follow the installation instructions on http://www.pip-installer.org/en/latest/installing.html
comment:11 by , 14 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed | 
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed | 
In [17636]:
(The changeset message doesn't reference this ticket)
Added 'sudo' to the easy_install example