Opened 8 years ago

Closed 8 years ago

Last modified 5 years ago

#7946 closed (fixed)

Object history should reuse existing date formats, instead of implementing itself

Reported by: Marc Garcia Owned by: nobody
Component: Internationalization Version: master
Severity: Keywords:
Cc: Triage Stage: Ready for checkin
Has patch: yes Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: UI/UX:


Django has some date formats in that can be defined in translations, and used anywhere. Different formats exists such as DATE_FORMAT, DATETIME_FORMAT, TIME_FORMAT...

Object history template is using another format, that actually is (or should be) the same as DATETIME_FORMAT, called DATE_WITH_TIME_FULL.

I think that if the format is the same, it should be defined once, or if it isn't the same, it should be added to to allow usage in user's code.

Attachments (1)

7946.diff (757 bytes) - added by Marc Garcia 8 years ago.
patch for using existing format

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (6)

Changed 8 years ago by Marc Garcia

Attachment: 7946.diff added

patch for using existing format

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by Jeff Anderson

milestone: 1.0
Needs documentation: unset
Needs tests: unset
Patch needs improvement: unset
Triage Stage: UnreviewedDesign decision needed

This makes sense to me, but I don't know if there was a good reason for doing it this way in the first place.

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by ebruning

Has patch: set

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by Jacob

Triage Stage: Design decision neededReady for checkin

comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by Russell Keith-Magee

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

(In [8485]) Fixed #7946: Modified object history template to use a common date format. Thanks to Marc Garcia for the report and patch.

comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by Jacob

milestone: 1.0

Milestone 1.0 deleted

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top