Opened 16 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#7599 closed New feature (fixed)
add get_user_permissions method to ModelBackend
Reported by: | Gary Wilson | Owned by: | jorgecarleitao |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.auth | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | jorgecarleitao | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Makes the code more readable and creates a useful method for subclasses.
Attachments (2)
Change History (20)
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | get_user_permissions.patch added |
---|
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Needs documentation: | set |
---|
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
milestone: | → post-1.0 |
---|
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Design decision needed |
---|
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
milestone: | post-1.0 |
---|
by , 14 years ago
Attachment: | get_user_permissions_patch_1.diff added |
---|
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
milestone: | → 1.3 |
---|---|
Needs documentation: | unset |
Triage Stage: | Design decision needed → Accepted |
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
Needs tests: | set |
---|
comment:9 by , 14 years ago
Severity: | → Normal |
---|---|
Type: | → New feature |
comment:12 by , 11 years ago
Needs documentation: | set |
---|
Documentation isn't correct - this isn't a method on the User
object, but on rather on ModelBackend
which is documented at the bottom of docs/ref/contrib/auth.txt
, although none of the methods for the backend are documented so presumably if we documented this one we'd want to document the rest. This ticket also has "needs tests" set, and while I imagine we could test the ability to override the method in a custom backend, I'm not convinced it's necessary as it doesn't look like the rest of the backend is tested in such a way.
comment:13 by , 11 years ago
timo is right. I added a pull request, https://github.com/django/django/pull/2127, that fixes the docs of ModelBackend and apply the patch.
I didn't added a test case because, like timo argued, the backend is not tested anyway. I will fill a ticket reporting this.
comment:14 by , 11 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:15 by , 11 years ago
Owner: | set to |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:16 by , 10 years ago
Needs documentation: | unset |
---|---|
Needs tests: | unset |
Patch needs improvement: | set |
Please uncheck "Patch needs improvement" when you update the PR, thanks.
comment:17 by , 10 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
comment:18 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Milestone post-1.0 deleted