Opened 7 months ago
Closed 5 days ago
#36315 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Use task groups/cancel scopes where possible
| Reported by: | Thomas Grainger | Owned by: | Thomas Grainger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | HTTP handling | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | async |
| Cc: | Carlton Gibson | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
eg replace asyncio.create_task with a Task Group
replace wait_for/wait with Timeout/CancelScope
create a function for asyncio.gather that uses a Task Group
This could use anyio.create_task_group and anyio.CancelScope, but now there's 3.11 asyncio.TaskGroup and asyncio.Timeout are available.
Obviously I'm biased and think the anyio versions are a better choice, but it's easier to add asyncio.TaskGroup/Timeout and worry about trio support in the 'future'.
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 7 months ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Owner: | set to |
comment:2 by , 7 months ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
comment:3 by , 7 months ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|---|
| Component: | Uncategorized → HTTP handling |
| Keywords: | async added |
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
| Type: | Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization |
comment:4 by , 7 months ago
| Summary: | use task groups/cancel scopes where possible → Use task groups/cancel scopes where possible |
|---|
comment:5 by , 6 days ago
| Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
|---|
I looked at both the PRs here, and they seem correct.
Yes, this seems like a nice modernisation. Thanks.