Opened 14 hours ago

Closed 9 hours ago

#36206 closed Cleanup/optimization (invalid)

Issues in the Existing SecurityMiddleware Code 1. Incorrect use of response.setdefault() instead of response.headers.setdefault() 2. In the process_request() method, HTTPS redirection is done While this works, %-formatting is less readable and slightly less performant than modern alternatives like f-strings 3. Preventing Overwriting of Existing Headers

Reported by: Abhijeet Kumar Owned by:
Component: HTTP handling Version: 5.1
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Abhijeet Kumar Triage Stage: Unreviewed
Has patch: no Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description (last modified by Tim Graham)

  1. Incorrect use of response.setdefault() instead of response.headers.setdefault()

Issue:
In the original code, the Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) header is set using:

response.setdefault("Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy", self.cross_origin_opener_policy)

This is incorrect because:

  1. response.setdefault() does not exist in Django’s HttpResponse class.
  2. Headers should be set using response.headers.setdefault() to ensure they are only added if they don’t already exist.

Suggested Modification:
Replace:

response.setdefault("Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy", self.cross_origin_opener_policy)

With:

response.headers.setdefault("Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy", self.cross_origin_opener_policy)
  1. Improving String Formatting for Readability & Performance

Issue:
In the process_request() method, HTTPS redirection is done using:

return HttpResponsePermanentRedirect(
    "https://%s%s" % (host, request.get_full_path())
)

While this works, %-formatting is less readable and slightly less performant than modern alternatives like f-strings.

Suggested Modification:
Change:

return HttpResponsePermanentRedirect(
    "https://%s%s" % (host, request.get_full_path())
)

To:

return HttpResponsePermanentRedirect(f"https://{host}{request.get_full_path()}")
  1. Preventing Overwriting of Existing Headers

Issue:

The original code unconditionally sets security headers like:

response.headers["Strict-Transport-Security"] = sts_header
response.headers["X-Content-Type-Options"] = "nosniff"

is could Override existing security policies set by other middleware or custom responses &
Prevent flexibility in modifying security headers dynamically.

Suggested Modification:

Use setdefault() instead of direct assignment:

response.headers.setdefault("Strict-Transport-Security", sts_header)
response.headers.setdefault("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff")

Suggested Code:

import re

from django.conf import settings
from django.http import HttpResponsePermanentRedirect
from django.utils.deprecation import MiddlewareMixin


class SecurityMiddleware(MiddlewareMixin):
    def __init__(self, get_response):
        super().__init__(get_response)
        self.sts_seconds = settings.SECURE_HSTS_SECONDS
        self.sts_include_subdomains = settings.SECURE_HSTS_INCLUDE_SUBDOMAINS
        self.sts_preload = settings.SECURE_HSTS_PRELOAD
        self.content_type_nosniff = settings.SECURE_CONTENT_TYPE_NOSNIFF
        self.redirect = settings.SECURE_SSL_REDIRECT
        self.redirect_host = settings.SECURE_SSL_HOST
        self.redirect_exempt = [re.compile(r) for r in settings.SECURE_REDIRECT_EXEMPT]
        self.referrer_policy = settings.SECURE_REFERRER_POLICY
        self.cross_origin_opener_policy = settings.SECURE_CROSS_ORIGIN_OPENER_POLICY

    def process_request(self, request):
        path = request.path.lstrip("/")
        if (
            self.redirect
            and not request.is_secure()
            and not any(pattern.search(path) for pattern in self.redirect_exempt)
        ):
            host = self.redirect_host or request.get_host()
            return HttpResponsePermanentRedirect(f"https://{host}{request.get_full_path()}")

    def process_response(self, request, response):
        if (
            self.sts_seconds
            and request.is_secure()
            and "Strict-Transport-Security" not in response.headers
        ):
            sts_header = f"max-age={self.sts_seconds}"
            if self.sts_include_subdomains:
                sts_header += "; includeSubDomains"
            if self.sts_preload:
                sts_header += "; preload"
            response.headers.setdefault("Strict-Transport-Security", sts_header)

        if self.content_type_nosniff:
            response.headers.setdefault("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff")

        if self.referrer_policy:
            # Support a comma-separated string or iterable of values to allow fallback.
            response.headers.setdefault(
                "Referrer-Policy",
                ",".join(
                    [v.strip() for v in self.referrer_policy.split(",")]
                    if isinstance(self.referrer_policy, str)
                    else self.referrer_policy
                ),
            )

        if self.cross_origin_opener_policy:
            response.headers.setdefault(
                "Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy",
                self.cross_origin_opener_policy,
            )

        return response

Change History (2)

comment:1 by Jake Howard, 12 hours ago

The formatting for the description is a little broken - could you fix it?

You're also describing 3 separate issues in one ticket, which makes reviewing difficult. Could you separate them?

They also seem to be in the realm of nitpicks and small changes (eg converting an f-string), which doesn't have a noticable impact on, well anything.

comment:2 by Tim Graham, 9 hours ago

Component: UncategorizedHTTP handling
Description: modified (diff)
Keywords: security.py removed
Resolution: invalid
Status: newclosed
Type: BugCleanup/optimization
  1. HttpResponse.set_default() exists.
  1. Per Python style guide, we won't accept PRs that merely change formatting style: "Don’t waste time doing unrelated refactoring of existing code to adjust the formatting method."
  1. It could be useful, but at this point it would be backward-incompatible, so I think we should leave it alone unless we have a very compelling use case. Changing anything security related can't be done lightly.

Thanks for the ideas. As Jake said, in the future, please don't combine separate issues in one ticket.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top