Opened 4 weeks ago
Last modified 4 weeks ago
#36097 assigned Cleanup/optimization
Remove the geographic database functions summary table
| Reported by: | Sarah Boyce | Owned by: | Sarah Boyce |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | GIS | Version: | 5.1 |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
The Geographic database function summary table is malformed and slightly misleading (rows make it seem like all functions relate to each other)
It is also fairly difficult to update.
I believe this table is there to group the functions. Instead of a table I believe we should group the functions with headers
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/5.1/ref/contrib/gis/functions/
Attachments (3)
Change History (8)
by , 4 weeks ago
| Attachment: | image-20250114-111030.png added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 4 weeks ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:2 by , 4 weeks ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
comment:3 by , 4 weeks ago
by , 4 weeks ago
| Attachment: | image-20250114-121804.png added |
|---|
by , 4 weeks ago
| Attachment: | image-20250114-121855.png added |
|---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I think that the summary table of the geographic functions of the database is a great-added value to the page, giving an immediate picture of the content of the page.
But I also think that the new hierarchical organization of the headers of the geographic functions of the database is a great improvement.
Before giving an opinion in favor of its removal of the table, could you post a screenshot of the contents' column with the new headers?