Opened 8 weeks ago
Closed 7 weeks ago
#35777 closed New feature (wontfix)
MySQL: cannot add key limited index on TEXT columns
Reported by: | Tobias Krönke | Owned by: | ishaan sangwan |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Heyo!
I have a model with a text field url = models.TextField()
and I would like to add an index to my MySQL 8.0.36 DB to speed up queries like url__startswith='https://google.com%'
-> WHERE url LIKE 'https://google.com%'
. I can actually do it by creating an index manually like so:
CREATE INDEX `my_limited_prefix_index` ON `my_model_table` (url(100));
However, I would like to be able to do it with the ORM. Having it only in the migrations as a data migration has many downsides:
- cannot run tests without running the migrations if i need the index in tests
- makes squashing migrations more painful
But it seems, this is impossible to achieve with the Meta.indexes
:
Index(fields=['url(100)'], name='my_limited_prefix_index')
-> denied by django with (models.E012) 'indexes' refers to the nonexistent field 'url(100)'
Index(expressions.RawSQL('url(100)', ()), name='my_limited_prefix_index')
-> denied by MySQL with syntax error (see https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/issues/5462, django adds double parantheses which is only valid syntax for expressions, but here I need a column definition)
Index(expressions.RawSQL('LEFT(url,100)', ()), name='my_limited_prefix_index')
-> creates a useless index that cannot be used by MySQL for startswith
(aka not sargable anymore).
I guess my favourite solution would be to allow the 2nd way with being able to turn off the surrounding expression parantheses.
Thx!
Change History (8)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 8 weeks ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 8 weeks ago
Replying to Sarah Boyce:
I feel this functionality exists and the way to go about this might be using Index.expressions and Left
Thx. Unfortunately, your feeling is not accurate. Your suggestion results in the same index created as my 3rd approach in the OP. That index however is useless. It cannot be used by MySQL for speeding up startswith
queries.
comment:3 by , 8 weeks ago
Resolution: | invalid |
---|---|
Status: | closed → new |
This is the kind of index I would like to be able to create: https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.4/en/create-index.html#create-index-column-prefixes. So called Column Prefix Key Parts
.
comment:4 by , 8 weeks ago
Index.condition with Q(startswith='https://google.com')
is probably also an option.
Update: sorry, that's also documented to not be supported on MySQL
comment:5 by , 8 weeks ago
The url__startswith='https://google.com%'
query was just an example. I would like to optimize all startswith
queries on that field. I've created this crude workaround and implemented my own Index
:
class ColumnPrefixIndex: max_name_length = 60 contains_expressions = False fields_orders = [] include = [] expressions = [] fields = [] condition = None def __init__(self, column, prefix, name): self.prefix = prefix self.column = column self.name = name def create_sql(self, model, schema_editor, using="", **kwargs): table = model._meta.db_table sql = f'CREATE INDEX {self.name} ON {table} ({self.column}({self.prefix}));' kwargs['sql'] = sql return schema_editor._create_index_sql( model, name=self.name, using=using, **kwargs, ) def deconstruct(self): kwargs = {'column': self.column, 'prefix': self.prefix, 'name': self.name} path = "%s.%s" % (self.__class__.__module__, self.__class__.__name__) return path, self.expressions, kwargs def clone(self): return self.__class__(self.column, self.prefix, self.name)
comment:6 by , 7 weeks ago
Owner: | set to |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
follow-up: 8 comment:7 by , 7 weeks ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:8 by , 7 weeks ago
Component: | Migrations → Database layer (models, ORM) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → wontfix |
Status: | assigned → closed |
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Unreviewed |
Type: | Uncategorized → New feature |
Version: | 5.0 |
Hello ishaan-sangwan and Tobias!
Thank you for your interest in making Django better. I'm afraid we can't accept this ticket yet, we may need to gather some consensus from the community before going ahead and adding this new index. To me, this feels a niche use case and thus I don't think this applies to the broader ecosystem, and Django is a framework designed to offer robust and accurate solutions for common scenarios.
If we would add a new index class, we should consider supporting all the DB backends that Django supports, not just MySQL. If we can't support all backends, I'm not sure it' a good idea to add this to Django. From a quick search, I'm not sure if this is possible?
To fully evaluate this, the recommended path forward is to first propose and discuss the idea with the community and gain consensus. To do that, please consider starting a new conversation on the Django Forum, where you'll reach a broader audience and receive additional feedback. Please be sure to add details about how this new index would look like for the other DB backends.
I'll close the ticket for now, but if the community agrees with the proposal, please return to this ticket and reference the forum discussion so we can re-open it. For more information, please refer to the documented guidelines for requesting features.
I feel this functionality exists and the way to go about this might be using Index.expressions and Left