Opened 15 months ago

Closed 15 months ago

Last modified 15 months ago

#34311 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)

Update serialization examples from unique_together to UniqueConstraint

Reported by: Willem Van Onsem Owned by: Willem Van Onsem
Component: Documentation Version: 4.1
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Triage Stage: Ready for checkin
Has patch: yes Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: yes UI/UX: no

Description (last modified by Willem Van Onsem)

The idea is thus to transform code on the page like:

class Mymodel(model):
      class Meta:
           unique_together = [[ 'field1', 'field2' ]]

to:

class Mymodel(model):
      class Meta:
           constraints = [models.UniqueConstraint(fields=('field1', 'field2'), name='field1_2_unique')]

Change History (10)

comment:1 by Tim Graham, 15 months ago

Summary: The documentation on serialization uses unique_togetherUpdate serialization examples from unique_together to UniqueConstraint
Triage Stage: UnreviewedAccepted

comment:2 by Moez Saidi, 15 months ago

Owner: changed from nobody to Moez Saidi
Status: newassigned

comment:3 by Mariusz Felisiak, 15 months ago

Has patch: set
Owner: changed from Moez Saidi to Willem Van Onsem

comment:4 by Waqar Ali, 15 months ago

I believe you're confusing model meta option constratins with unique_together. UniqueConstraint is a DB constraint assigned to constraints option in Meta whereas unique together is another option on Meta level.

class Mymodel(model):
      class Meta:
           unique_together = [ 'field1', 'field2' ]
           constratints = [ UniqueConstraint ]

in reply to:  4 comment:5 by Willem Van Onsem, 15 months ago

Replying to Waqar ALi:
No, Django had in the early days unique_together, now it still has, but as the note on the documentation says (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/ref/models/options/#django.db.models.Options.unique_together):

Use UniqueConstraint with the constraints option instead.

It "translated" to a unique constraint. But it was less flexible since one could not give it a custom name, add a condition, make it a functional unique constraint, etc. So UniqueConstraint is the "new way" to define this, whereas unique_together is the "old" way to generate such database constraint.

comment:6 by Willem Van Onsem, 15 months ago

Description: modified (diff)

The idea is thus to transform code on the page like:

class Mymodel(model):
      class Meta:
           unique_together = [[ 'field1', 'field2' ]]

to:

class Mymodel(model):
      class Meta:
           constraints = [models.UniqueConstraint(fields=('field1', 'field2'), name='field1_2_unique')]

comment:7 by Mariusz Felisiak, 15 months ago

Patch needs improvement: set

comment:8 by Mariusz Felisiak, 15 months ago

Patch needs improvement: unset
Triage Stage: AcceptedReady for checkin

comment:9 by Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mariusz@…>, 15 months ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

In 292aaca:

Fixed #34311 -- Updated serialization docs from unique_together to UniqueConstraint.

comment:10 by Mariusz Felisiak <felisiak.mariusz@…>, 15 months ago

In 7a88b1f:

[4.2.x] Fixed #34311 -- Updated serialization docs from unique_together to UniqueConstraint.

Backport of 292aacaf6c3d6956ca2c51c41e36dbf425389346 from main

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top