Opened 3 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
#33944 closed New feature (invalid)
Is it cleaner to make the upload_to function a method of the model class
| Reported by: | Willem Van Onsem | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Documentation | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
In the documentation of the upload_to field (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/fields/#django.db.models.FileField.upload_to), it works with an example:
def user_directory_path(instance, filename):
# file will be uploaded to MEDIA_ROOT/user_<id>/<filename>
return 'user_{0}/{1}'.format(instance.user.id, filename)
class MyModel(models.Model):
upload = models.FileField(upload_to=user_directory_path)
I'm wondering if this isn't more convenient by defining this as an instance method, so:
class MyModel(models.Model):
def user_directory_path(self, filename):
# file will be uploaded to MEDIA_ROOT/user_<id>/<filename>
return 'user_{0}/{1}'.format(self.user.id, filename)
upload = models.FileField(upload_to=user_directory_path)
Then the function can be used as a method, for example to just determine a file path without having to use it in the FileField per se. It also avoid defining all "standalone" functions that seem to be coupled to a model, and thus will make the models.py file less chaotic.
Hi Willem. I think you're likely free to do that, but I think questions such as this are better targeted at support channels. See TicketClosingReasons/UseSupportChannels.
(I don't think it's a change we need to enforce, or favour in the docs even.)