Opened 4 years ago

Last modified 7 days ago

#32770 assigned Cleanup/optimization

Add system check for django.contrib.postgres in INSTALLED_APPS when using the fields, indexes, and constraints it provides.

Reported by: Seth Yastrov Owned by: Clifford Gama
Component: contrib.postgres Version: dev
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Hannes Ljungberg, Simon Charette Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: no Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

Given the following model + index:

from django.db import models
from django.contrib.postgres.indexes import GinIndex, OpClass
from django.db.models.functions import Cast

class MyModel(models.Model):
    class Meta:
        indexes = [
            GinIndex(OpClass(Cast("id", output_field=models.TextField()), name='gin_trgm_ops'), name='foobar')
        ]

After running makemigrations and running the migration, it produces the SQL:

CREATE INDEX "foobar" ON "myapp_mymodel" USING gin ((CAST("id" AS text) gin_trgm_ops));

Which is a syntax error on Postgres (version 12). The reason is the extra parentheses around CAST.

According to the ticket's flags, the next step(s) to move this issue forward are:

  • To provide a patch by sending a pull request. Claim the ticket when you start working so that someone else doesn't duplicate effort. Before sending a pull request, review your work against the patch review checklist. Check the "Has patch" flag on the ticket after sending a pull request and include a link to the pull request in the ticket comment when making that update. The usual format is: [https://github.com/django/django/pull/#### PR].

Change History (11)

comment:1 by Mariusz Felisiak, 4 years ago

Cc: Hannes Ljungberg added
Component: MigrationsDatabase layer (models, ORM)
Easy pickings: unset
Resolution: worksforme
Status: newclosed

Extra parentheses shouldn't be an issue on PostgreSQL. Also I cannot reproduce this crash on PostgreSQL 12.6, see the following test.

    def test_trigram_op_class_cast_gin_index(self):
        index_name = 'trigram_op_class_castgin'
        index = GinIndex(OpClass(Cast('id', CharField(max_length=255)), name='gin_trgm_ops'), name=index_name)
        with connection.schema_editor() as editor:
            editor.add_index(Scene, index) 
        with editor.connection.cursor() as cursor:
            cursor.execute(self.get_opclass_query, [index_name])
            self.assertCountEqual(cursor.fetchall(), [('gin_trgm_ops', index_name)])
        constraints = self.get_constraints(Scene._meta.db_table)
        self.assertIn(index_name, constraints)
        self.assertIn(constraints[index_name]['type'], GinIndex.suffix)
        with connection.schema_editor() as editor:
            editor.remove_index(Scene, index)
        self.assertNotIn(index_name, self.get_constraints(Scene._meta.db_table))
CREATE INDEX "trigram_op_class_castgin" ON "postgres_tests_scene" USING gin ((CAST("id" AS varchar(255))) gin_trgm_ops)

comment:2 by Hannes Ljungberg, 4 years ago

I'm pretty sure that you're seeing this error because of not adding django.contrib.postgres to INSTALLED_APPS, see: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/contrib/postgres/indexes/#opclass-expressions

comment:3 by Seth Yastrov, 4 years ago

Resolution: worksforme
Status: closednew
Summary: GinIndex with OpClass and Cast results in Postgres syntax error in migrationGinIndex with OpClass and Cast results in Postgres syntax error in migration when django.contrib.postgres is not part of INSTALLED_APPS

Mariusz Felisiak, thanks for your comment. If you'll see my example, the extra parentheses are surrounding gin_trgm_ops as well, not just the CAST expression. This seems to be the problem.

Thank you Hannes Ljungberg!

I did not notice that the documentation says to add django.contrib.postgres to INSTALLED_APPS. That fixes the problem.

Would it be an idea to make a check that django.contrib.postgres is in INSTALLED_APPS when making use of OpClass so that instead of encountering a Postgres syntax error and not knowing what to do (and assuming there is a bug in Django), you would get a helpful error message telling how to correct the problem?

Therefore I'm reopening the issue, and hoping that this check can be made, as despite this requirement being mentioned in the docs, the current behavior is quite unintuitive.

Last edited 4 years ago by Seth Yastrov (previous) (diff)

comment:4 by Mariusz Felisiak, 4 years ago

Resolution: needsinfo
Status: newclosed
Summary: GinIndex with OpClass and Cast results in Postgres syntax error in migration when django.contrib.postgres is not part of INSTALLED_APPSAdd system check for django.contrib.postgres in INSTALLED_APPS when using OpClass().
Type: BugNew feature

Therefore I'm reopening the issue, and hoping that this check can be made, as despite this requirement being mentioned in the docs, the current behavior is quite unintuitive.

It would be really complicated. First of all, we would need to mix-up logic from a contrib app and the ORM. Secondly OpClass() don't need to be the topmost expression, so the flatten list of expression would be necessary. Thirdly we don't have similar checks for fields from django.contrib.postgres app which also require including 'django.contrib.postgres' in INSTALLED_APPS, e.g. HStoreField. I don't think it's worth complexity, however we can reconsider this decision if someone provides PoC.

comment:5 by Simon Charette, 11 months ago

Cc: Simon Charette added

In the light of continuous reports of users running into this qwirk (#35431 being the latest one) I wonder if we could

  1. Have all fields defined in contrib.postgres have their check method make sure that 'django.contrib.postgres' in INSTALLED_APPS
  2. Adjust Model._check_indexes to do something similar to what we did with Constraint check delegation in 0fb104dda287431f5ab74532e45e8471e22b58c8
  3. Have both contrib.postgres indexes and constraints perform the same 'django.contrib.postgres' in INSTALLED_APPS check

Thoughts?

comment:6 by Simon Charette, 9 days ago

I'd like to re-iterate my plea for the above to take place. I helped another user who ran into the same issue today and it was far from clear what exactly was to blame.

Now that 2. from comment:5 is accepted under #36273 would there be interest in re-opening this ticket?

Last edited 9 days ago by Simon Charette (previous) (diff)

comment:7 by Javier Buzzi, 8 days ago

Hello, "user who ran into this same issue" here, I am in favor of A. reopening this issue, and B. adding this check so it is clear what needs to be done, instead of chasing my tail for a day and a half.

Thanks!

comment:8 by Tim Graham, 8 days ago

Component: Database layer (models, ORM)contrib.postgres
Resolution: needsinfo
Status: closednew
Version: 3.2dev

It seems feasible now that Simon outlined a plan.

comment:9 by Clifford Gama, 7 days ago

Owner: changed from nobody to Clifford Gama
Status: newassigned

comment:10 by Simon Charette, 7 days ago

Summary: Add system check for django.contrib.postgres in INSTALLED_APPS when using OpClass().Add system check for django.contrib.postgres in INSTALLED_APPS when using the fields, indexes, and constraints it provides.
Triage Stage: UnreviewedAccepted
Type: New featureCleanup/optimization

Clifford note that this ticket won't be completable until #36273 is completed as the check that should be added django.contrib.postgres.PostgresIndex requires that check method be exposed to subclasses to avoid coupling core with contrib.

comment:11 by Clifford Gama, 7 days ago

Thanks Simon👍. I noticed, and cc'd myself in #36273 so as to stay up-to-date with the goings-on there.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top