#3264 closed defect (duplicate)
[patch] object_list in archive_year view always contains items in ascending order
Change History (4)
by , 18 years ago
Attachment: | respect_model_ordering.diff added |
---|
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
See #3134 where another solution is proposed, would you mind writing a small comparison of both patches so the people with SVN commiting powers can review it and decide if/what to implement in trunk?. I don´t dare to mark one of both tickets as duplicate of the other because it will close it in the process.
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I'm marking this as a duplicate of #3134, as I think that is the better solution.
To compare the two: this patch changes the archive_year
view to use the model's default ordering (thus changing the behaviour of the view); the patch at #3134 offers an optional parameter to specify ordering, defaulting to the current behaviour if left blank. The latter patch also updates the docs.
#3134 is missing unit tests though; unless anyone else provides them first I will add them when I can.
respect ordering specified in the model