Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#29584 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Implement an optimized version of get_many() for the db cache backend
| Reported by: | Raphaël Hertzog | Owned by: | oliver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Core (Cache system) | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Herbert Fortes | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | yes | UI/UX: | no |
Description
The documentation of get_many in django.core.cache.backends.base.BaseCache implies that the implementation of the method for a database backend can be much faster:
Fetch a bunch of keys from the cache. For certain backends (memcached,
pgsql) this can be *much* faster when fetching multiple values.
However when I look into django.core.cache.backends.db I don't see any get_many implementation meaning that retrieving 1000 entries from the cache will do 1000 queries instead of just one. This is really sad and makes this backend a no-go for any heavy usage of the cache.
Change History (10)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 7 years ago
| Easy pickings: | set |
|---|---|
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
| Version: | 1.11 → master |
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
Replying to Simon Charette:
Are you interested in working on a patch?
It's not among my priorities, sorry. But once there's a fix, I hope it will be backported to 1.11.
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
This doesn't qualify for a backport based on our supported versions policy.
comment:4 by , 7 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:5 by , 7 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:8 by , 7 years ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|---|
| Patch needs improvement: | set |
comment:9 by , 7 years ago
| Patch needs improvement: | unset |
|---|---|
| Summary: | cache.backends.db does not implement get_many → Implement an optimized version of get_many() for the db cache backend |
| Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
It should be straightforward to implement and test using
assertNumQueries.Are you interested in working on a patch?