Opened 7 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#28647 new New feature
Add support for python-brace-format for variables within {% blocktrans %}
Reported by: | Aidas Bendoraitis | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Internationalization | Version: | 1.11 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Claude Paroz, Maciej Olko | Triage Stage: | Someday/Maybe |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Currently with gettext()
function you can use both, older-style python format %(variable)s
and newer style python-brace-format {variable}
, for example:
gettext('Hello, %(addressee)s!') % {'addressee': 'World'} gettext('Hello, {addressee}!').format(addressee='World')
Unfortunately, {% blocktrans %}
always produces the old-style format with the %
sign.
I think, it would make sense to add a parameter to the {% blocktrans %}
tag by which you could define the python string format you want to produce.
According to my experience with not-so-technical translators, %(variable)s
format in the django.po
files is more confusing than {variable}
.
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
I'm not a fan for adding yet another parameter for that.
We could switch to the new format
syntax, but that would be backwards-incompatible because po files would change. That could be doable through a from future load blocktrans
transition.
Is it worth it? Should we ask on the django-developers ML?
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Someday/Maybe |
---|
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
Exactly how, I'm not sure, but this would definitely be worthwhile IMHO (I have a bunch of i18n projects, and yes, transition would be annoying, but something that could be fixed with a script). I'm sort of living with this, but today I hit a string that I have defined both in Python and in a template, and end up with two strings in the .po file:
"Some thing %(foo)s"
"Some thing {foo}"
Grrrr.
comment:5 by , 3 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
What do you think, Claude?