Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#28285 closed Bug
Updating Password Hasher Invalidates Users First Login After Upgrade — at Version 1
Reported by: | Simon Blanchard | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.auth | Version: | 1.11 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
The code below, from contrib.auth.base_user.py
, says "hash upgrade is not a password change"
def check_password(self, raw_password): """ Return a boolean of whether the raw_password was correct. Handles hashing formats behind the scenes. """ def setter(raw_password): self.set_password(raw_password) # Password hash upgrades shouldn't be considered password changes. self._password = None self.save(update_fields=["password"]) return check_password(raw_password, self.password, setter)
but the code in contrib.auth.get_user()
verifies the session by comparing a salted hmac of the password hash to the same thing stored in the session.
If we update the password hash the salted hmac will change. Therefore, the session will no longer be considered valid and will be flushed. We can keep the session alive by updating the HASH_SESSION_KEY
in request.session
e.g. via the update_session_auth_hash()
function. But this is not called by the setter function when the hasher is updated.
So the first time the user logs (with the correct password) following an upgrade, their (valid) session will be flushed and they will be logged out again.
Here's my understanding of the scenario:
I don't think there's a way to keep session A valid is this scenario. Am I misunderstanding something?