Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 8 weeks ago
#27587 assigned Cleanup/optimization
Document str(QuerySet.query)
Reported by: | Peter Inglesby | Owned by: | JosiahDub |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Documentation | Version: | 1.10 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Ülgen Sarıkavak | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
As far as I can tell, the only place where the behaviour of str(QuerySet.query)
is mentioned in the docs is as a throwaway comment in the aggregation topic, and in a code example in the GeoDjango tutorial.
This is very useful behaviour but it is not widely known. Additionally, its limitations (see ticket:12611, "Incorrect quoting in QuerySet.query.str()") are even less widely known.
I think it would be suitable to add this to section 2 of the tutorial, and to the Making queries topic guide.
Change History (13)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Easy pickings: | unset |
---|---|
Summary: | str(QuerySet.query) should be documented → Document str(QuerySet.query) |
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
Type: | Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization |
Another place to document it is docs/ref/models/querysets.txt
.
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
The current limitations described in this ticket and in #18631 should also be mentioned.
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
comment:7 by , 7 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
comment:8 by , 2 years ago
Has patch: | unset |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:9 by , 2 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
Docs patch looks good. Small comments on PR.
I recall related work to improve the output of str(qs.query)
— by having the backend do the quoting — but I'm not 100% sure how far that got. This matters for the it's not great disclaimer, and whether we want to close this as completed (or not) on merge? 🤔
comment:11 by , 19 months ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
The PR is an improvement over what is currently there, so why not merge it?
comment:12 by , 19 months ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
Have you checked comments on the latest PR? We cannot merge this as .query
is not something that we can recommend to users without fixing #25705.
comment:13 by , 8 weeks ago
Cc: | added |
---|
Regarding the limitations, I don't think we should accept the current status quo as the best we can do:
I did that some time ago for
last_executed_query
. SQLite stayed at 3 for half a decade before moving to 2.I believe the same logic should apply to QuerySet.query and similar methods.