Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#27493 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
GIS raster transformation test failures due to precisions with GDAL 2.1
Reported by: | Sergey Fedoseev | Owned by: | Nicolas Noé |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | GIS | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Installed GDAL version: 2.1.2.
====================================================================== FAIL: test_implicit_raster_transformation (gis_tests.rasterapp.test_rasterfield.RasterFieldTest) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/sergey/dev/django/tests/gis_tests/rasterapp/test_rasterfield.py", line 105, in test_implicit_raster_transformation 23.94249275457565, 0.0, -9.459646421449934e-06] AssertionError: Lists differ: [-87.92985512665508, 9.4596464... != [-87.9298551266551, 9.45964642... First differing element 0: -87.92985512665508 -87.9298551266551 - [-87.92985512665508, ? ^^ + [-87.9298551266551, ? ^ 9.459646421449934e-06, 0.0, 23.94249275457565, 0.0, -9.459646421449934e-06] ====================================================================== FAIL: test_raster_transform (gis_tests.gdal_tests.test_raster.GDALRasterTests) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/sergey/dev/django/tests/gis_tests/gdal_tests/test_raster.py", line 363, in test_raster_transform self.assertEqual(target.origin, [9124842.791079799, 1589911.6476407414]) AssertionError: [9124842.791079797, 1589911.6476407414] != [9124842.791079799, 1589911.6476407414]
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
Summary: | some GIS raster tests fails locally → some GIS raster tests fail locally |
---|
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Summary: | some GIS raster tests fail locally → GIS raster transformation test failures due to precisions with GDAL 2.1 |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
I can reproduce with gdal 1.11.5 (was working fine with 1.11.3).
Working on a simple patch to relax precision expectations, as suggested by Tim.
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I haven't tried to reproduce myself. Perhaps the test assertions should be relaxed a bit.