Opened 2 years ago

Last modified 2 years ago

#26661 new Cleanup/optimization

Why not using AppConfig's name attribute instead of app_name in urls.py?

Reported by: john-bonachon Owned by: nobody
Component: Core (URLs) Version: 1.9
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Marten Kenbeek Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: no Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

In Django 1.9 you can namespace your urls by adding app_name in urls.py

If the name will (generally) be the same as the containing module app, why not just call it like that, or at least reusing the AppConfig name attribute from apps.py?

Am I missing something? That's confusing when you are reading the tutorial for the first time.

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by Tim Graham

Cc: Marten Kenbeek added

I seems to remember discussing this during the development of this feature (#21927) but I'm not certain. Marten, do you recall?

comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by Tim Graham

Component: Core (Other) → Core (URLs)
Triage Stage: Unreviewed → Accepted
Type: Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization

We might end up changing the ticket to a documentation issue to explain the design.

comment:3 in reply to:  2 Changed 2 years ago by john-bonachon

Replying to timgraham:

We might end up changing the ticket to a documentation issue to explain the design.

Oh.. no interest in reusing the app name?

comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by Tim Graham

I said "might" because I cannot recall the original design discussion and say for certain whether or not the idea is a good one or is feasible to implement.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top