Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 2 months ago
#24121 closed New feature
Provide a better repr() experience — at Version 15
Reported by: | Keryn Knight | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | django@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | yes | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
For a long time, Django has shipped with the debug 500 handler, which defaults to a view where "local vars" for every stack frame can be expanded and inspected to see the internal state at the various points in the stack trace.
Between that renderer, the heavy usage of django-debug-toolbar
, which ships with a template context inspector, and my preference throwing pdb
everywhere, there is a notable lack of a good repr()
experience in much of Django, both in debugging public API (that is, the bits a user will use and encounter), and internals that might be exposed, or could otherwise be served better by having a repr that says something more than it's address/id.
A couple of previous tickets have addressed this in minor, one off ways - #23167, #22906, #22531 - but as I've begun collecting places they could supply useful info as I spot them in my stuff, they've become a hodgepodge across a number of modules.
For example, a couple I've got implemented:
<TemplateResponse status_code=200, charset=utf-8, _is_rendered=False> <LoaderOrigin name=/absolute/path/to/templates/admin/change_list.html, loadname=admin/change_list.html> <FilterExpression var=u'admin/change_list.html', filters=[]>
All of which, IMHO, provide a more useful context in which to evaluate state.
The branch I have implemented my reprs in is in no way merge ready yet, partially because there's no tests, and it'd need rebasing & squashing, but also because there are some parts I'd like to see reprs on but haven't landed on a good way to do so.
An example being the concept of a Loader
, which currently has no repr() and thus shows up as <path.to.cached.Loader … 0xETC>
which at least tells us which loader is being referenced. Given the convention so far for reprs() is just the class name (rather than module + class), the fact all Loaders (and now Engines) all share the same class name means in exposing more useful internal state we lose knowledge of the loader in question's module namespace.
As I write this, I've got at least rudimentary (as in, it was possibly to replace the 0x... with at least one object-state variable) reprs for:
StaticNode
BlockTranslateNode
added in d3ecef26b9fda02b88f925a800ae38dd5873c878URLNode
added in 179ee13eb37348cd87169a198aec18fedccc8668Token
added in 179ee13eb37348cd87169a198aec18fedccc8668Lexer
added in 179ee13eb37348cd87169a198aec18fedccc8668Parser
added in 179ee13eb37348cd87169a198aec18fedccc8668FilterExpression
RedirectFallbackMiddleware
MessageMiddleware
RemoteUserMiddleware
Col
Lookup
BaseDatabaseWrapper
SQLCompiler
JoinPromoter
added in c96f11257baf43188ff9daeddab3221992925c85HttpResponse
,HttpResponseRedirect
,HttpResponseNotAllowed
added in 9c40f01a66bd15457e10a0bbf28c803968b5dabbLazySettings
,Settings
, andUserSettingsHolder
added in d4b10a725614322769a419180039771634a06571GeoIP2
PermWrapper
SessionStorage
CookieStorage
FallbackStorage
ChangeList
AdminForm
InlineAdminFormSet
CsrfViewMiddleware
Response
SimpleTemplateResponse
TemplateResponse
AdminSite
ModelAdmin
Origin
TemplateOrigin
BlockContext
IncludeNode
Template
/Engine
(would need work still I think)
If accepted, this ticket could just track whatever I can end up getting reviewed/merged, or it could be a meta-ticket for accepting as a principle, and I could spin off tickets for more targeted areas.
Change History (15)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
Component: | Uncategorized → Core (Other) |
---|
comment:7 by , 4 years ago
Easy pickings: | set |
---|
Marking as easy pickings as I think this can be achieved in stages -- I'm not expecting someone to propose a PR that addresses all of these in one go!
comment:8 by , 4 years ago
In https://github.com/django/django/pull/14045: Refs #24121 -- Added repr to django.template.defaulttags.URLNode
comment:9 by , 4 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:11 by , 4 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:12 by , 4 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
comment:13 by , 4 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
comment:15 by , 4 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Has patch: | unset |
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
charset
,name
andloadname
should also be a string.Here's an example from Python: