#239 closed defect (fixed)
Initializing a model instance should not require fields with blank
Reported by: | maurycy | Owned by: | Adrian Holovaty |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Metasystem | Version: | |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
1. [maurycy@localhost ~]$ export DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE='model_test.settings.main' 2. [maurycy@localhost ~]$ cat model_test/apps/test/models/test.py 3. from django.core import meta 4. 5. class Test(meta.Model): 6. fields = ( 7. meta.IntegerField('number', 'number', blank=True, default=666), 8. ) 9. admin = meta.Admin() 10. [maurycy@localhost ~]$ django-admin.py sqlall test 11. BEGIN; 12. CREATE TABLE test_tests ( 13. id integer NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, 14. number integer NOT NULL 15. ); 16. INSERT INTO packages (label, name) VALUES ('test', 'test'); 17. INSERT INTO content_types (name, package, python_module_name) VALUES ('test', 'test', 'tests'); 18. INSERT INTO auth_permissions (name, package, codename) VALUES ('Can add test', 'test', 'add_test'); 19. INSERT INTO auth_permissions (name, package, codename) VALUES ('Can change test', 'test', 'change_test'); 20. INSERT INTO auth_permissions (name, package, codename) VALUES ('Can delete test', 'test', 'delete_test'); 21. COMMIT; 22. [maurycy@localhost ~]$ django-admin.py install test 23. [maurycy@localhost ~]$ python 24. Python 2.4.1 (#1, May 16 2005, 15:19:29) 25. [GCC 4.0.0 20050512 (Red Hat 4.0.0-5)] on linux2 26. Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. 27. >>> from django.models.test import tests 28. >>> test = tests.Test(id=None) 29. >>> test.save() 30. Traceback (most recent call last): 31. File "<stdin>", line 1, in ? 32. File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/meta.py", line 87, in _curried 33. return args[0](*(args[1:]+moreargs), **dict(kwargs.items() + morekwargs.items())) 34. File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/meta.py", line 737, in method_save 35. f.pre_save(self, getattr(self, f.name), add) 36. AttributeError: 'Test' object has no attribute 'number'
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
Hmm. You have named your app "test". That's not a good idea with Python - test is a module in the standard library and depending on how imports are done you might stumble over this builtin "test" module. It's a quite usual people run into with python.
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
This is a user error; you've got to fill in all the fields of the object if you're creating it by hand (note that manipulators handle this for you).
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
Resolution: | invalid |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
I think that it should be done better.
I'm working on sessions subsystem and I have the following model:
fields = ( meta.CharField('name', 'name', maxlength=100, db_index=True, unique=True), meta.CharField('path', 'path', maxlength=60, default='/', blank=True, null=True), meta.CharField('domain', 'domain', maxlength=200, default=REGISTRATION_COOKIE_DOMAIN, blank=True), meta.IntegerField('max_age', 'max age in seconds', default=7200, blank=True), meta.BooleanField('is_secure', 'is secure', blank=True), )
Now, in the most cases no one will have to fill path, domain or max_age, because defaults are pretty good. Forcing users to fill them once more time, especially if default and blank are set, is unnecessary.
comment:5 by , 19 years ago
priority: | high → normal |
---|
comment:6 by , 19 years ago
Status: | reopened → new |
---|---|
Summary: | AttributeError on fields with blank and default → Initializing a model instance should not require fields with blank=True or "default" |
Ah, now I understand the issue. I agree that initializing a model instance shouldn't require fields with blank=True or "default" set. I'll work on the change.
comment:7 by , 19 years ago
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:8 by , 19 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:10 by , 18 years ago
Summary: | Initializing a model instance should not require fields with blank=True or "default" → Initializing a model instance should not require fields with blank |
---|
If it's not the bug, creating uninitialized blank fields with default should be better documented.