Opened 10 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

Last modified 10 years ago

#23082 closed Bug (worksforme)

Cache Backend Inconsistencies and Reverse Compatible Failures

Reported by: kyle_owens Owned by: nobody
Component: Core (Other) Version: 1.7-rc-1
Severity: Release blocker Keywords: cache memcached pylibmc
Cc: Tim Graham Triage Stage: Unreviewed
Has patch: no Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

When using memcached as the caching server for Django 1.7, a certain test will fail when using one backend but not the other.

# Passes
import memcache
mc = memcache.Client(['127.0.0.1:11211'])
mc.set("test", 3, -1)


# Fails
import pylibmc
mc = pylibmc.Client(["127.0.0.1:11211"])
mc.set("test", 3, -1)

These above snippets are specific examples of what a set would look like in each backend. The python-memcached correctly passes the -1 timeout to the interface of memcached while the pyLibMC passes 18446744073709551615.

This can be witnessed in the memcache log when the verbosity is turned up using -vv in the conf file or options parameters.

This appears to be an error in the way the PyLibMC library handles "-1" as a timeout value.

To demonstrate that this passes with one and fails with the other, please run:

PYTHONPATH=..:$PYTHONPATH python ./runtests.py --settings=test_sqlite cache.tests.MemcachedCacheTests

and between runs, change the settings file to reflect these two options:

# Fails Unit Tests
CACHES = {
    'default': {
        'BACKEND': 'django.core.cache.backends.memcached.PyLibMCCache',
        'LOCATION': '127.0.0.1:11211',
    }

# Passes Unit Tests
CACHES = {
    'default': {
        'BACKEND': 'django.core.cache.backends.memcached.MemcachedCache',
        'LOCATION': '127.0.0.1:11211',
    }

This example was run on an Ubuntu server with memcached installed using:

sudo apt-get install memcached

One change was made to "/etc/memcached.conf" such that "-vv" was uncommented to increase logging output and memcached was restarted.

The line of code where the time out it set is line 57-60 in ./django/core/cache/backends/memcached.py

        elif int(timeout) == 0:
            # Other cache backends treat 0 as set-and-expire. To achieve this
            # in memcache backends, a negative timeout must be passed.
            timeout = -1

This is a traceback from the django unit tests run with the pylibmc backend.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/sbsu/django/tests/cache/tests.py", line 508, in test_zero_timeout
    cache.set('key1', 'eggs', 0)
  File "/home/sbsu/django/django/core/cache/backends/memcached.py", line 89, in set
    self._cache.set(key, value, self.get_backend_timeout(timeout))
ClientError: error 9 from memcached_set: CLIENT ERROR

I am currently uncertain of the correct way to fix this issue. The ramifications of this issue are that it is impossible to have immediately expiring cache values through the pylibmc caching backend. The reverse incompatible issues rise from before the patch surrounding issue #22845, the only way of which I'm aware to have non-expiring cache values was to set cache.default_timeout = 0. Doing so in version 1.7 RC 1 will throw exceptions from the memcached server that are unexpected in the django caching framework. This will lead to legacy code being broken.

Attachments (1)

23082-release-note.diff (1.0 KB ) - added by Tim Graham 10 years ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (7)

comment:1 by Tim Graham, 10 years ago

I got 44 passing tests (1 skipped) with pylibmc 1.3.0. Are you using an older version? Perhaps it's a bug in PyLibMC that's been fixed.

comment:2 by Tim Graham, 10 years ago

Resolution: worksforme
Status: newclosed

I also tested back to PyLibMC 1.1 and had no problems. Please reopen if can provide more details (or ping me, timograham, in #django-dev). Thanks!

comment:3 by Tim Graham, 10 years ago

Cc: Tim Graham added

I could reproduce the error on another machine. I believe we should take up the issue with PyLibMC to see if it's a bug on their end. In the meantime, could you please review the doc patch with my understanding of the backwards compatibility concerns.

by Tim Graham, 10 years ago

Attachment: 23082-release-note.diff added

comment:4 by kyle_owens, 10 years ago

Reviewed doc patch. Sufficient to prevent issues moving from older versions of django to version 1.7.

comment:5 by Tim Graham <timograham@…>, 10 years ago

In 8568e7cfa4fb87cd0a9ead1b3fbb7a39d19e98b9:

Added backwards incompatibility note for refs #22845; refs #23082.

Thanks Kyle Owens for the report.

comment:6 by Tim Graham <timograham@…>, 10 years ago

In 663af270b58f350bcbd9df5cd04ffe69e8ac37c8:

[1.7.x] Added backwards incompatibility note for refs #22845; refs #23082.

Thanks Kyle Owens for the report.

Backport of 8568e7cfa4 from master

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top