#22809 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Refactor model field references
Reported by: | jorgecarleitao | Owned by: | jorgecarleitao |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Documentation | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
At the moment, the API references of the model Field are scattered in docs/howto/custom-model-field.txt
and docs/ref/models/fields.txt
.
I propose to move all the references to docs/ref/models/fields.txt
and keep the howto
part of the documentation more focused on the subject, e.g. avoiding defining
.. method:: Field.get_prep_value(value)
there.
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
Pull request: https://github.com/django/django/pull/2796
Both sections of the docs still require a major editorial process on wording and references to models,
either to be addressed in this ticket or another.
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
Please uncheck "Patch needs improvement" when you want me to review it.
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:7 by , 10 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
Still has some problems and doesn't merge cleanly.
comment:8 by , 10 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
Fixed the problems and rebased against master.
comment:9 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Yes, probably at the bottom of the page in their own section sounds good.