#22257 closed New feature (fixed)
Write to specified file for dumpdata
Reported by: | Gwildor Sok | Owned by: | ANUBHAV JOSHI |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Management commands) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | anubhav9042@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
In response of ticket #22251, I'm opening this as a separate issue like requested. You can read the need for this option there, but basically it removes the current need and practice of redirecting the output of the command to a file, which is often done like this:
$ ./manage.py app1 app2 .. --format=json > dump.json
Removing the need to always do this would open up the possibility to add verbosity during the serialization (see #22251 and a new separate ticket for that).
Concrete proposal:
Add an option to specify a file name to write the output to (under the current working directory), and generate one automatically when one is not specific (e.g. "dump_20140312_1337".json/.xml").
Change History (19)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
I have already created patch for this. But one thing I want to ask is that whether we should keep default as stdout
or as proposed in the ticket some dumpdata.json
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
I have yet to add tests.
https://github.com/coder9042/django/compare/ticket_22258?expand=1
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 11 years ago
Add an option to specify a file name to write the output to (under the current working directory)
Why under the current working directory? open()
does the right thing by default, if given a relative path, it'll use the current working directory. The current working directory could very much be readonly, and requiring people to cd
to target a specific directory is not practical.
From a quick look at the patch, I think it does the right thing.
follow-up: 10 comment:7 by , 11 years ago
Replying to loic84:
Add an option to specify a file name to write the output to (under the current working directory)
Why under the current working directory?
open()
does the right thing by default, if given a relative path, it'll use the current working directory. The current working directory could very much be readonly, and requiring people tocd
to target a specific directory is not practical.
From a quick look at the patch, I think it does the right thing.
I'm sorry, this was what I meant. So you can also do -o ../dumps/dump.json
, or something alike. Patch indeed looks good on that matter.
About the default: I agree that defaulting to stdout
is the way to go to maintain backwards compatibility. The main reason I opted for generating a filename and using that when not specific, is in the light of ticket #22258.
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 11 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
follow-up: 11 comment:10 by , 11 years ago
Replying to Gwildor:
About the default: I agree that defaulting to
stdout
is the way to go to maintain backwards compatibility. The main reason I opted for generating a filename and using that when not specific, is in the light of ticket #22258.
Do you have any ideas in mind. If yes then please comment them out on #22258 itself. I want to know exactly what you are suggesting.
You want progress to be displayed.Fine, but it would be nice to have some elaborations.
Also as in #22251, by russellm:"we're limited by the progress reporting tools of the underlying serialisation frameworks. If you've got any ideas on how this can be achieved, I'd love to hear them."
comment:11 by , 11 years ago
I think we can keep default as stdout
and and for #22258, we can do the following:
- When -o is not used, let the data be printed to
stdout
, as the data is printing people can see it and I don't think any progress display is required there. Also people may not want to open a file everytime they performdumpdata
even for small databases. If its large they'll use -o.
- When -o will be used, then we can display progress percentage or something like that.
backwards compatibilty is there, also issue in #22258 is also addressed.
thoughts?
comment:12 by , 11 years ago
If you're outputting to console, I don't see how you can display a progress indicator. Making a progress indicator dependent on the use of -o seems like a reasonable approach to me.
comment:13 by , 11 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
comment:14 by , 11 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin → Accepted |
comment:15 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Yes, that makes sense.