#21590 closed Cleanup/optimization (invalid)
Don't require forms clean_* methods to return a value
| Reported by: | Aymeric Augustin | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Forms | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Adding custom validation to forms isn't as DRY as it colud be:
class MyForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = MyModel
def clean_title(self):
title = self.cleaned_data["title"]
validate_title(title) # custom validation
return title
def clean_slug(self):
slug = self.cleaned_data["slug"]
validate_slug(slug) # custom validation
return slug
The requirement that clean() return a cleaned_data dict was recently lifted; what about doing the same for clean_*()? Then the example above could be simplified to:
class MyForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = MyModel
def clean_title(self):
validate_title(self.cleaned_data["title"]) # custom validation
def clean_slug(self):
validate_slug(self.cleaned_data["slug"]) # custom validation
Otherwise developers go for private APIs, eg.:
class MyForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = MyModel
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(MyForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.fields["title"].validators.append(validate_title)
self.fields["slug"].validators.append(validate_slug)
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
| Resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
We can't do this, as None is potentially a valid value for the field. It is conceivable for a field to have a non-None value beforehand, and a clean method to modify it to become None. In the case of clean(), this is not a problem as None is not a valid value for self.cleaned_data.
Maybe it was overlooked to allow
clean_*()to returnNone?