Opened 11 years ago

Closed 11 years ago

Last modified 11 years ago

#20943 closed Bug (fixed)

Signal receivers cache should weakly reference senders.

Reported by: Simon Charette Owned by: nobody
Component: Core (Other) Version: 1.6-beta-1
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Triage Stage: Ready for checkin
Has patch: yes Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

The signal receivers caching introduced in 704ee33f503c96b96c2682b946a11b3b42318ba7 (#16679) to speed up model initialization keeps strong reference to sender thus preventing them from being garbage collected.

In [1]: import gc

In [2]: import weakref

In [3]: from django.dispatch import Signal

In [4]: signal = Signal(use_caching=True)

In [5]: def receiver(**kwargs): pass

In [6]: signal.connect(receiver)

In [7]: class cls: pass

In [8]: wref = weakref.ref(cls)

In [9]: signal.send(cls)
Out[9]: [(<function __main__.receiver>, None)]

In [10]: del cls

In [11]: gc.collect()
Out[11]: 33

In [12]: wref() is None
Out[12]: False

Since the cache is only enabled on signals with BaseModel ((pre|post)_init, (pre|post)_save, (pre|post)_delete and m2m_changed) or module (post_syncdb) instances senders this shouldn't be an issue in usual cases since those objects are not meant to be garbage collected during the life of the application.

However it might cause issues to people dynamically creating model classes and modules since those objects won't be garbage collected as of Django 1.6.

I suggest we use a WeakKeyDictionary to cache sender receivers in order to prevent regressions in 1.6 and avoid hard to traceback memory leaks.

Running djangobench on the soon to be attached patch revealed no significant slowdowns.

Attachments (1)

0001-Fixed-20943-Weakly-reference-senders-when-caching-th.patch (4.9 KB ) - added by Simon Charette 11 years ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (6)

comment:1 by Simon Charette, 11 years ago

Severity: Release blockerNormal
Summary: Signal receivers caching should weakly reference senders.Signal receivers cache should weakly reference senders.

I guess this shouldn't be marked as Release Blocker since dynamic model creation is not usual among Django users.

comment:2 by Anssi Kääriäinen, 11 years ago

Triage Stage: UnreviewedReady for checkin

The patch looks good to me, and I can confirm that there isn't any performance regression in query_all test, which is dependant on model initialization signal speeds.

EDIT: just noticed, caching was removed from post_syncdb. Any reason for that?

Last edited 11 years ago by Anssi Kääriäinen (previous) (diff)

comment:3 by Simon Charette <charette.s@…>, 11 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

In e55ca60903adcfd525938335b1ad9dbb6fd96c3e:

Fixed #20943 -- Weakly reference senders when caching their associated receivers

comment:4 by Simon Charette <charette.s@…>, 11 years ago

In f0bc2865ff9d85c952fa86ae19aee062a5e883cd:

Fixed #20943 -- Weakly reference senders when caching their associated receivers

Backport of e55ca60903 from master.

comment:5 by Andrew Godwin <andrew@…>, 11 years ago

In 63378163f9c5f3f9f9b42a6f260f798aa7e4b1f6:

Fixed #20943 -- Weakly reference senders when caching their associated receivers

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top