Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#20534 closed Bug (duplicate)
Make TECHNICAL_500 more resilient (against large variables and non-utf-8)
Reported by: | Walter Doekes | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | 1.4 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Walter Doekes | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Hi,
I recently had errors that didn't provide a nice TECHNICAL_500_TEMPLATE mail.
The cause turned out to be two things:
(1) large variables caused a mail so large that the MXs refused to deliver them
(2) non-utf8 representations of objects caused errors while handling the error
The attached fix fixed it.
This was done against Django 1.4. Apologies in advance if this is fixed somewhere already. I couldn't find a relevant bug report.
Triggering (1) should be a matter of generating an error up the stack with a huge variable. Triggering (2) can be done like this:
urlpatterns = ( # Error test (r'500$', (lambda r: Crap())), # ExplodeInYourFaceError ) class Crap(Exception): def __init__(self): raise self def __repr__(self): return 'X\xe9X'
Regards,
Walter Doekes
OSSO B.V.
Attachments (1)
Change History (5)
by , 12 years ago
Attachment: | django20534_make_debug_more_resilient.patch added |
---|
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Shouldn't objects always be presented in utf-8 unicode by default?
Should and should. In this particular case it was (a) a third party lib (b) throwing an exception with binary data in the representation.
We can argue all day about whether that's right, but error reporting shouldn't choke on it.
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Good idea to trim large variables.
Shouldn't objects always be presented in utf-8 unicode by default?