Opened 12 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#19705 closed Bug
CommonMiddleware handles If-None-Match incorrectly — at Version 1
Reported by: | Aymeric Augustin | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | HTTP handling | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | hirokiky@…, real.human@…, k@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
Two middleware check ETags for unmodified responses: CommonMiddleware
and ConditionalGetMiddleware
and they do it inconsistently.
If the response's ETag matches the request's If-None-Match:
ConditionalGetMiddleware
changes the response code to 304, preserving all headers; the content gets removed later onCommonMiddleware
creates a newHttpResponseNotModified
without content and simply restores the cookies.
As a consequence, CommonMiddleware
returns a response without ETag, which is wrong. I detected this with RedBot on a Django site I run. Any site with USE_ETAGS = True
has this problem.
In general, wiping headers sounds like a bad idea. A 304 is supposed to have the same headers as the 200. (Well, the RFC is more complicated, but I think it's the general idea. Future versions of HTTP will likely require the Content-Length not to be 0.)
I believe that CommonMiddleware
should simply generate the ETag and not handle conditional content removal; that's the job of ConditionalGetMiddleware
.
For example, if one is using GzipMiddleware, the correct response chain is:
CommonMiddleware
computes the ETag,GzipMiddleware
compresses the content and modifies the ETag,ConditionalGetMiddleware
uses the modified ETag to decide if the response was modified or not.
This is a good reason to keep "ETag generation" and "Etag checking" concerns separate. The same argument applies to any middleware that sets or modifies ETags.
Unfortunately, CommonMiddleware
is documented to "take care of sending Not Modified responses, if appropriate", so this would be a backwards incompatible change.
Change History (1)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Summary: | CommonMiddleware handles If-Modified-Since incorrectly → CommonMiddleware handles If-None-Match incorrectly |
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |