Opened 19 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#1840 closed defect (duplicate)
django's decorators don't assign necessary attributes to the wrapper
Reported by: | Owned by: | nobody | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | minor | Keywords: | |
Cc: | gary.wilson@…, myer0052@…, ben@… | Triage Stage: | Design decision needed |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | yes | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
If a view function is wrapped with a Python decorator, the admin interface will show that decorator in place of the actual view (in admin/doc/views). For example:
/admin/doc/views/
View function: django.contrib.admin.views.decorators._checklogin
The actual view function is 'django.contrib.admin.views.doc.view_index', but it's wrapped with the staff_member_required() decorator, which in turn returns the _checklogin function object.
Attachments (3)
Change History (23)
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
priority: | normal → low |
---|---|
Severity: | normal → minor |
I'm not sure what we can do to fix this...We'd have to somehow peek into the function to see whether it was being decorated or not. Either that, or each view decorator would have to mark itself as a decorator somehow, and the admin view-doc system would have to keep an eye out for that special mark. Hmmmm. Any other ideas?
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
You could make the decorators set the name of the function they return to be the name of function they take:
def mydecorator(myfunc): def wrapper(*args, **kwargs): # do something here, then... return myfunc(*args, **kwargs) wrapper.__name__ = myfunc.__name__ wrapper.__doc__ = myfunc.__doc__ return wrapper
Then everything would be lovely. Of course, you'd have to do that on every decorator. Alternatively, you could use the module I posted a link to above, which does that automatically, and a lot more (including making 'wrapped' have the same function signature as 'myfunc', so you can introspect it nicely).
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
Ah, except that it doesn't work. If you include module as well, then you get the whole name correct, but for some reason the documentation doesn't show up. And the 'decorator' module I linked seems to work even less (I'm sure I found that module from a reputable source like Ian Bicking or someone). I'll investigate it a bit.
comment:5 by , 19 years ago
OK, the first part of my last comment was nonsense -- the method described does work (I was getting mixed up between difference view functions).
As for using the 'decorator' module, there is a very easy one line fix to apply (he just forgot to do the wrapper.__module__ = myfunc.__module__
bit for some reason), then it works for the documentation. However, I'm getting bizarro messages when actually trying to *use* the views.
comment:6 by , 19 years ago
This is how i'm doing it in one of my decorators that adds extra context to a generic view:
class GenericViewContextAdder(object): """ Add extra context to a generic view function. Example usage: from django.views.generic import list_detail from nong.common.views import GenericViewContextAdder foo_list = GenericViewContextAdder(list_detail.object_list, 'title', bar=lambda original: mymodels.get_object(name__exact=original)) """ def __init__(self, method_to_wrap, *arguments_to_steal, **arguments_to_transform): self.method_to_wrap = method_to_wrap self.arguments_to_steal = arguments_to_steal self.arguments_to_transform = arguments_to_transform doc = "" for l in self.method_to_wrap.__doc__.splitlines(): doc += l.replace(' ', '', 1) doc += '\n' doc = doc.replace('Context:', '\nContext:\n\n', 1) doc = doc.replace('Templates:', '\nTemplates:\n\n', 1) self.method_to_wrap.__doc__ = 'This view is a wrapper around the ' \ + doc self.method_to_wrap.__doc__ += '\nExtra context:\n\n' for stolen_argument in self.arguments_to_steal: self.method_to_wrap.__doc__ += '\n\t%s\n' % stolen_argument for stolen_argument, transformation in self.arguments_to_transform: self.method_to_wrap.__doc__ += '\n\t%s=%s\n' % \ (stolen_argument, transformation) def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs): extra_context = {} for stolen_argument in self.arguments_to_steal: extra_context[stolen_argument] = kwargs.pop(stolen_argument) for stolen_argument, transformation in self.arguments_to_transform: original_value = kwargs.pop(stolen_argument) transformed_value = transformation(original_value) extra_context[stolen_argument] = transformed_value kwargs.setdefault('extra_context', {}).update(extra_context) return self.method_to_wrap(*args, **kwargs) @property def __name__(self): return self.method_to_wrap.__name__ @property def __module__(self): return self.method_to_wrap.__module__
This works for me.
comment:7 by , 19 years ago
Luke -- which bizarro messages are you getting when you try to use the views? I've added the __doc__
, __name__
and __module__
assignments in my local copy of django.utils.decorators.decorator_from_middleware, and the problem is fixed with no side effects.
comment:8 by , 19 years ago
Adrian -- the __doc__
, __name__
and __module__
assignments should be fine. I was using the 'decorator' module, which does that for you and also creates 'signature preserving' decorators, so you can use getargspec etc on them. However, I've just discovered that I was using it incorrectly, and using it correctly works very well.
The advantages of using the module are:
- You don't have to repeat the
__doc__
,__name__
etc assignments (although I guess you could put them in a utility function) - You preserve the signature of the original functions, so you can introspect them.
The disadvantages are:
- Adding more code to Django (120 lines, which includes doctests)
- The changes you have to make are not quite as trivial as I thought before -- I thought it was just adding
staff_member_required = decorator(staff_member_required
. In reality, you have to change the decorator function like this:
def staff_member_required(view_func): def _wrapped(request, *args **kwargs): # Do stuff with request return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
to
@decorator.decorator def staff_member_required(view_func, request, *args, **kwargs): # Do stuff with request return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
The transformation is very straightforward in each case -- write a 'caller' (which takes a function and the arguments to pass to it) instead of a typical decorator, and then use 'decorator' to make it into a very well-behaved decorator. In some sense it is a simplification -- you have a simple higher order function instead of higher order function plus closure. On the other hand, it is a slight obfuscation, since staff_member_required() looks like it takes several arguments, but it ends up as a callable that takes a single argument.
Overall I think I'm in favour of using it -- it would also solve the problem that Gary Wilson just mentioned in django-devs about not being able to use decorators with filters.
comment:9 by , 18 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Keywords: | rthml tab space editor js added |
Summary: | admin/doc/views shows decorator instead of actual view function → hi-world cup |
comment:10 by , 18 years ago
Cc: | removed |
---|---|
Summary: | hi-world cup → admin/doc/views shows decorator instead of actual view function |
comment:11 by , 18 years ago
Summary: | admin/doc/views shows decorator instead of actual view function → [patch] admin/doc/views shows decorator instead of actual view function |
---|---|
Version: | → SVN |
comment:12 by , 18 years ago
We could require python2.5 and use the update_wrapper
and wraps
functions of the new functools module :)
Or, if we don't want to require 2.5, try to import the function(s) from the functools module, and if that fails then use a fake function/decorator that does nothing. Only people using 2.5 would see the benefit, but on the bright side it would require less code and would be the future.
comment:13 by , 18 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Component: | Admin interface → Core framework |
Keywords: | rthml tab space editor js removed |
Summary: | [patch] admin/doc/views shows decorator instead of actual view function → django's decorators don't assign necessary attributes to the wrapper |
There are more decorators than just in the admin interface. Also removing patch from title since it's invalid.
comment:14 by , 18 years ago
Here is the description of the update_wrapper
function:
Update a wrapper function to look like the wrapped function. The optional arguments are tuples to specify which attributes of the original function are assigned directly to the matching attributes on the wrapper function and which attributes of the wrapper function are updated with the corresponding attributes from the original function. The default values for these arguments are the module level constants WRAPPER_ASSIGNMENTS (which assigns to the wrapper function's name, module and documentation string) and WRAPPER_UPDATES (which updates the wrapper function's instance dictionary).
The main intended use for this function is in decorator functions which wrap the decorated function and return the wrapper. If the wrapper function is not updated, the metadata of the returned function will reflect the wrapper definition rather than the original function definition, which is typically less than helpful.
by , 18 years ago
Attachment: | RaviKumar2.doc added |
---|
comment:15 by , 18 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:16 by , 18 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Design decision needed |
---|
follow-up: 18 comment:17 by , 18 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Needs tests: | set |
Hi. I made a really simple patch that is horribly simple and works fine AFAIK. All it does is add the following code, within the decorator functions in django.contrib.auth.decorators and django.contrib.admin.decorators:
_checklogin.__name__ = view_func.__name__ _checklogin.__module__ = view_func.__module__
This provides the appropriate variables to the admin.view_index view to make everything work swimmingly, and shouldn't mess with anything else.
by , 18 years ago
Attachment: | admindocdecoratorfix.diff added |
---|
SVN patch for this ticket that changes decorator code to report the decorated function to admin.doc views
comment:18 by , 18 years ago
Replying to dan.ferrante at gmail:
__name__
is read-only in Python 2.3, so this would break compatibility.
comment:19 by , 17 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:20 by , 17 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Marking this a dup of #5701 since we have a patch there.
This module may be helpful:
http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~micheles/python/documentation.html