Opened 13 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#18169 closed Bug (fixed)
NoReverseMatch silenced in template Variable
Reported by: | Szymon Teżewski | Owned by: | regebro |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Template system | Version: | 1.4 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | template exception sprint2013 |
Cc: | d1fffuz0r@… | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Let's see some - maybe strange, but possible and working - template schema.
base.html:
{% block content %} {% block error_here %}{% endblock %} {% endblock %}
and some template extending it:
{% extends "base.html" %} {% block content %} content {{ block.super }} {% endblock %} {% block error_here %} error here {% url non_existing_url %} {% endblock %}
I was really surprised that in this situation exception from url tag - NoReverseMatch - fails silently, and whole 'error_here' block just don't render.
But when the same faulty tag is directly in 'content' block - we see error page. We also see error page when we replace url tag f.e. with some invalid tag - error will be normally returned.
All this cases are shown in simple project (fresh django 1.4) which I attach.
Attachments (5)
Change History (15)
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | project.tar.gz added |
---|
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | 18169.diff added |
---|
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | 18169.2.diff added |
---|
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
Summary: | Strange exception handling in templates → NoReverseMatch silenced in template Variable |
---|
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Design decision needed |
---|
I tried the attached code and I got the reported exception.
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Needs tests: | set |
Triage Stage: | Design decision needed → Accepted |
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Needs tests: | unset |
Patch can't applied
(django)django|master⚡ ⇒ git apply 18169.2.patch error: patch failed: django/template/base.py:774 error: django/template/base.py: patch does not apply
I made some improvements and tests for this patch in attached file.
by , 12 years ago
Attachment: | 181692.3.patch added |
---|
comment:6 by , 12 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:7 by , 12 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
I tested the patch on current trunk and it worked.
When just reraising an exception you don't actually need to catch it, so I made that very minor change.
comment:8 by , 12 years ago
Keywords: | sprint2013 added |
---|
comment:9 by , 11 years ago
I don't think the patch is corrrect. It is special-casing NoReverseMatch in a place where such special casing isn't appropriate.
If I understand correctly the reason why NoReverseMatch doesn't cause errors when {% url %} fails is that the error isn't raised from variable lookup, it is raised from node rendering. {{block.super}} goes through variable lookup, and the variable lookup then silences the error.
The whole silent_variable_failure attribute in NoReverseMatch seems pointless. I don't know why we would want to silence NoReverseMatch error if it is risen in variable resolution context, but not if it is risen from {% url %}. Removing that attribute fixes this issue. All of the tests pass.
There might be some cases where the removal will cause backwards compatibility problems. For example if you have a method view_link() for some object, and that raises NoReverseMatch -> before you would get silent failure if doing {{ someobj.view_link }}, after NoReverseMatch. I am ready to call that a bugfix...
There is another issue, that is {{ block.super }} should not silence *any* errors, even if they happen to have silent_variable_failure. The reason is that if a silent_variable_failure exception gets to block.super, it wasn't from variable lookup to begin with (that is, block.super has already dealt with all exceptions in the proper way, there is no need to do that processing a second time.
See branch https://github.com/akaariai/django/tree/ticket_18169 for fixes. The first commit removes the silent_variable_failure from NoReverseMatch, the second one removes the silent_variable_failure from exceptions in {{block.super}}.
I think the first patch is ready for commit, the second one might need a separate ticket.
comment:10 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
I found reason why it is acting like this. It is because NoReverseMatch exception still have silent_variable_failure = True and it's just not silenced because url tag is re-raising exception.
But in this case exception is passing also {{ block.super }} Variable, which silences exceptions with silent_variable_failure = True. Don't know how to better do it (or if it should be done at all), but I'm attaching small diff that re-raises NoReverseMatch exception while resolving Variable.