URL resolving / reversing design doesn't allow alternate specs
|Reported by:||samuel337||Owned by:||Marten Kenbeek|
|Severity:||Normal||Keywords:||url resolve reverse|
|Has patch:||no||Needs documentation:||no|
|Needs tests:||no||Patch needs improvement:||no|
Django's URL resolution system is currently based on regexps and is represented by the RegexURLPattern class. There are cases where it would be preferable to subclass this and allow alternate ways of specifying URL patterns that ultimately compile down to regexps.
Right now, this works for URL resolving as during resolution, the resolve method on the RegexURLPattern class is called, and hence subclasses can modify that behaviour. It however, doesn't work for URL reversal, because the resolver class generates the possible matches itself, instead of calling a method on RegexURLPattern or its subclasses as is the case with URL resolution.
The attached patch simply refactors urlresolvers.py so the resolver calls a method on RegexURLPattern to get possible matches. It passes all the URL tests in Django, is completely backwards-compatible and introduces no new issues or quirks.
I don't believe any new tests are required, and because the new method on RegexURLPattern is marked private (hence subject to change), no new docs are required either. This should stay as an unsupported way to extend Django's URL system until it is fully revamped (support disjunctives, URI templates etc.).
The relevant thread on django-developers is here - http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/c94b551ebd57fbe6/65d79a336fef04b2
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
|Patch needs improvement:||set|
|Triage Stage:||Unreviewed → Accepted|