Exclude query with multiple conditions for the same multi-value relation not correct

[Ben Buchwald <bb2@…>]

According to ​http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/queries/#spanning-multi-valued-relationships: "all the conditions in a single exclude() statement apply to a single instance (if those conditions are talking about the same multi-valued relation)." This works correctly for filter() but for exclude() it is operating the same as if it was 2 separate exclude() calls. Here's an example set of models:

class Song(models.Model):
   name = models.CharField(max_length=30)

class Release(models.Model):
   song = models.ForeignKey(Song)
   format = models.CharField(max_length=3,choices=(('cd',"CD"),('mp3',"MP3")))
   released = models.BooleanField()
   class Meta:
      unique_together = ['song','format']

If I want to ask for all of the songs that have a CD release that has already gone out this filter works:

Song.objects.filter(release_set__format='cd',release_set__released=1)

But if I want to find all the songs that don't have a CD release that has gone out (either it has one that hasn't been released yet, or it doesn't have a release record at all), this exclude statement is not working:

Song.objects.exclude(release_set__format='cd',release_set__released=1)

It produces this SQL:

('SELECT U0.`id` FROM `songs_song` U0 
  WHERE NOT (U0.`id` IN (SELECT U1.`id` FROM `songs_release` U1 
                         WHERE U1.`format` = %s) AND 
             U0.`id` IN (SELECT U1.`id` FROM `songs_release` U1 
                         WHERE U1.`released` = %s ))',
('cd', True))

Instead of what I would expect (and give me the right results):

('SELECT U0.`id` FROM `songs_song` U0 
  WHERE NOT (U0.`id` IN (SELECT U1.`id` FROM `songs_release` U1 
                         WHERE U1.`format` = %s AND 
                               U1.`released` = %s ))',
('cd', True))

Song.objects.filter(~Q(release_set__format='cd',release_set__released=1)) produces the same result, but Song.objects.exclude(Q(release_set__format='cd',release_set__released=1)) produces the even more wrong:

('SELECT U0.`id` FROM `songs_song` U0 INNER JOIN `songs_release` U1 ON (U0.`id` = U1.`song_id`)
  WHERE NOT ((U1.`format` = %s  AND U1.`released` = %s ))',
('cd', True))

[rma]

Can confirm in Django 1.2.4 (Mac OS X 10.6.5) and Django 1.2.3 (Debian Squeeze). Multiple conditions in a single exclude() call result in each condition being evaluated to a distinct instance, rather than all conditions being applied to a single instance.

[Aymeric Augustin]

#17315 was a duplicate. It contains a thorough demonstration of the problem.

[anonymous]

I can confirm this Bug on Django 1.3.1 on Linux.

[Chris]

Still present in master.

You can get SQL which returns what you would expect using this:

Song.objects.exclude(id__in=Release.objects.filter(format='cd',released=1).values('song'))

This gives the query you would expect originally:

SELECT "songs_song"."id", "songs_song"."name" FROM "songs_song"
WHERE NOT (
    "songs_song"."id" IN (
        SELECT U0."song_id"
        FROM "songs_release" U0
        WHERE (U0."released" = True  AND U0."format" = cd)
    )
)

[Chris]

Please note that this behaviour contradicts the documentation.

According to the documentation (from ​https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.5/topics/db/queries/#spanning-multi-valued-relationships):

"All of this behavior also applies to exclude(): all the conditions in a single exclude() statement apply to a single instance (if those conditions are talking about the same multi-valued relation). Conditions in subsequent filter() or exclude() calls that refer to the same relation may end up filtering on different linked objects."

But exclude actually filters each condition on a different linked object.

[Anssi Kääriäinen]

This one will be hard to fix correctly. Consider case:

Song.objects.exclude((Q(release_set__format='cd') | Q(pk=1)) & (Q(release_set__format='lp') | Q(pk=2)))

As far as I understand the only sensible way to write this is to have a query:

SELECT * FROM "song" WHERE NOT EXISTS (
    SELECT 1
      FROM "release_set"
     WHERE ((format = 'cd' OR "song"."pk" = 1)
            AND
            (format = 'lp' OR "song"."pk" = 2)
           AND "song"."pk" = "release_set"."song_id"

that is, the whole condition must be pushed down into EXISTS query. The condition should be pushed down from the lowest connector that contains all the references to the same subquery.

[David Seddon]

I've submitted a pull request for some documentation to draw attention to this behaviour. Let me know if you'd like it adjusted.

​https://github.com/django/django/pull/3898

[David Seddon]

Just following up on the pull request, is this something that would be useful to be added to the documentation?

​https://github.com/django/django/pull/3898

[David Seddon]

I've been looking at correcting the documentation and have just realised that one of the statements in the original bug report is wrong: "This works correctly for filter() but for exclude() it is operating the same as if it was 2 separate exclude() calls."

Actually, the behaviour is a bit different:

Song.objects.exclude(release_set__format='cd',release_set__released=1) would exclude Songs that have both CD releases and releases that have gone out.

Song.objects.exclude(release_set__format='cd').exclude(release_set__released=1), on the other hand, would exclude Songs that have either CD releases or releases that have gone out.

I've made a gist that sums this up in the form of tests: ​https://gist.github.com/seddonym/84407891a11389419c14

[Anssi Kääriäinen]

I think it is time to start working on this. I think we have two major bugs in Django ORM:

1. This one.
2. Aggregation over multiple different multivalued relations, or aggregation after filtering over m2m relation produces wrong results.

In addition, we have the problem that filtering over multivalued relation doesn't use a subquery, instead you have to use distinct.

These all are mixed together. Unfortunately this isn't easy to fix. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't try.

[Tim Graham <timograham@…>]

In 6770b7ec:

Refs #14645 -- Documented bug with exclude() and multi-value relations

[Tim Graham <timograham@…>]

In b46643a4:

[1.7.x] Refs #14645 -- Documented bug with exclude() and multi-value relations

Backport of 6770b7ecd208a0746f181e54202fb829460c6490 from master

[Tim Graham <timograham@…>]

In 744d9a10:

[1.8.x] Refs #14645 -- Documented bug with exclude() and multi-value relations

Backport of 6770b7ecd208a0746f181e54202fb829460c6490 from master

[Tim Graham <timograham@…>]

In 48f5adf:

[1.6.x] Refs #14645 -- Documented bug with exclude() and multi-value relations

Backport of 6770b7ecd208a0746f181e54202fb829460c6490 from master

[Can Sarıgöl]

I tried to fix this issue with ​PR as much as the sample that's in the description. Does the approach and solution place make sense?

[Mariusz Felisiak]

#31922 was closed as a duplicate.