#12837 closed (fixed)
Clarify m2m intermediate table naming strategy
Reported by: | Ramiro Morales | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Documentation | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Keywords: | ||
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Reports #12614 and #12810 hint about the fact the "By default, this table name is generated using the names of the two tables being joined." phrase at http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/fields/#id1 is creating confusion among users. We should change that to state the table is named after the model field names.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
by , 15 years ago
Attachment: | 12837.diff added |
---|
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
(In [12516]) Fixed #12837 -- Clarified the naming strategy for m2m intermediate tables. Thanks to Ramiro Morales for the report and patch.