Opened 15 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#12685 closed New feature (fixed)
Serialized objects' save function does not respect force_insert
Reported by: | dcotruta | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Serialization) | Version: | 1.1 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | save, force_insert, force_update |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
Given a serialized trivial object, of the type models.Model, which does not override any functions, a deserialized object does not accept the force_insert keyword argument for its save function.
class XYZ(models.Model): xyz_creation_date = models.DateTimeField(verbose_name=_("Date Opened"), blank=False, auto_now_add=True, editable=False ) xyz_is_open = models.BooleanField(default=True) xyz_last_updated = models.DateTimeField(verbose_name=_("Last Report"), blank=False, auto_now=True ) xyz_synced = models.BooleanField(default=False)
If this model exists on two separate servers, and instances of this object are serialized, passed over the wire, and then deserialized, the save function on the receiving server cannot pass force_insert=True - doing so yields "save() got an unexpected keyword argument 'force_insert'".
Any ideas?
Change History (20)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → invalid |
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | invalid |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Erm, I'm not asking a question, I'm stating a fact.
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/models/instances/#saving-objects states very clearly the function signature as:
Model.save([force_insert=False, force_update=False, using=DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS])
Deserialized objects of the type I've described above, which DO NOT override the save behavior, don't accept the force_insert keyword argument. This is not a question - it's a bug.
Unless I'm missing something, there should be no difference in the behavior of save for deserialized objects.
follow-up: 8 comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Needs tests: | set |
The problem is that the call to save_base in core/serializers/base.py within the class DeserializedObject does not have the capability to carry through the correct signature.
It's simple to fix:
class DeserializedObject(object):[[BR]] ... def save(self, save_m2m=True, force_insert=False, force_update=False): # Call save on the Model baseclass directly. This bypasses any # model-defined save. The save is also forced to be raw. # This ensures that the data that is deserialized is literally # what came from the file, not post-processed by pre_save/save # methods. # dcotruta - changed signature to handle force_insert and force_update models.Model.save_base(self.object, raw=True, force_insert=force_insert, force_update=force_update) ...
I'll provide a patch tonight, when I get round to it.
russellm - next time actually read the problem - I'm not trying to be rude, but this kind of attitude is not helpful in open source!
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
Has patch: | unset |
---|
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) → Serialization |
---|---|
milestone: | → 1.2 |
Fixed component to show this is a serialization, not models, bug.
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
Keywords: | save force_insert force_update added |
---|
comment:7 by , 15 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 15 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Unreviewed |
---|
Replying to dcotruta:
The problem is that the call to save_base in core/serializers/base.py within the class DeserializedObject does not have the capability to carry through the correct signature.
Exactly, and this (the existence of DeserializedObject, the fact that its save method isn't the same as the Model save method, and that you need to provide your own logic to decide if a DeserializedObject instance should be saved or not) is intended and documented (in the documentation that should be read in first place: The one about (de)serializing) behavior:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.1/topics/serialization/#deserializing-data
comment:9 by , 15 years ago
I do see what you're trying to say, but you must admit that in many cases serialization is used to carry out trivial synchronization. In those cases, it makes sense to be able to implement the normal save behavior - indeed it would be doubly useful to be able to use new attributes like force_insert since they would throw pk errors "for free" - a very easy way of preventing data overwrites.
Just because you can create your own save function doesn't mean the built in one should fail to support standard attributes available everywhere else.
I'm not submitting this bug just for the fun of it, but because force_insert is a rather unusual call which happens to be very useful when handling over-the-wire object movement.
comment:10 by , 15 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:11 by , 15 years ago
milestone: | 1.2 |
---|
1.2 is feature-frozen, moving this feature request off the milestone.
comment:12 by , 14 years ago
Severity: | → Normal |
---|---|
Type: | → New feature |
comment:15 by , 12 years ago
Status: | reopened → new |
---|
comment:16 by , 10 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:17 by , 10 years ago
Added test case and fix here: https://github.com/django/django/pull/4811
comment:18 by , 10 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Needs tests: | unset |
comment:19 by , 10 years ago
Owner: | removed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → new |
Trac is not for asking how-to questions. If you want to know how to do something, ask on django-users.