Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#11611 closed (invalid)
can't place two comment forms in one template. Because "prefix" attribute is not supported in __init__ of this form
Reported by: | Alexander Lyabah | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.comments | Version: | 1.0 |
Severity: | Keywords: | ||
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I just don't get. Why you design CommentSecurityForm.init so strange?
Attachments (2)
Change History (8)
by , 15 years ago
Attachment: | prefix_for_comment.diff added |
---|
by , 15 years ago
Attachment: | prefix_for_comment.2.diff added |
---|
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I'm sorry - if you want us to take a problem report seriously, you have to take the reporting process seriously. This report:
- Asks a question in the ticket title
- Expresses incredulity, but doesn't actually explain the problem in the body
- Provides a patch that doesn't contain any explanation or documentation.
I'm not going to play 20 questions while I try to work out what this ticket and patch is trying to achieve. If you care to provide a detailed description of the underlying problem and the approach you have taken to solve it, feel free to reopen the ticket.
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | invalid |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Summary: | How can I add prifix attribute, to CommentForm? → can't place two comment forms in one template. Because "prefix" attribute is not supported in __init__ of this form |
I'm sorry. But this bug, was so unexpected for me, that's why report was so short.
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
and I'm sorry again. How can I fix description of ticket? Or I must open one more ticket?
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
If you could just clearly describe what the bug is, what the expectation is and what actually happens in a c omment that would be good.
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
@oduvan - the "bug" may be "unexpected", but you haven't described what the problem _is_. The report is so short that it doesn't actually contain any information. *PLEASE* - I'm begging you - EXPLAIN THE PROBLEM.
Closing again until we have an actual problem description.
no, this fix will be better. It fix security check to.