Code

Changes between Version 45 and Version 46 of VersionOneFeatures


Ignore:
Timestamp:
01/14/07 00:48:44 (7 years ago)
Author:
mir@…
Comment:

rewrote the comments that referred to my opinion

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • VersionOneFeatures

    v45 v46  
    3939#2553 proposes to make generic views respond 
    4040in formats other than html, and it does not go into details nor does it 
    41 include a patch. From the description I couldn't find out what it 
     41include a patch. From the description it isn't clear what it 
    4242actually proposes, but it looks like a compatible change. 
    4343 
    4444=== Comments === 
    45 Jacob plans to rewrite them for newforms. I'd say this change 
    46 actually belongs into the category 'newforms'. I'm not entirely 
    47 convinced that it is necessary to rewrite the comments in 1.0, though. 
     45Jacob plans to rewrite them for newforms. This change rather 
     46belongs into the category 'newforms'. Is it really necessary to rewrite the comments in 1.0? 
    4847Other than the changes in admin, the comments system rewrite shouldn't 
    49 directly influence the API of newforms. 
     48directly influence the API of newforms. -- mir 
    5049 
    5150=== Oracle === 
     
    7069and that they are an important step to make django applications safe, 
    7170but the consensus about it was not that strong. Or do we want to use it 
    72 in the admin? 
     71in the admin? -- mir 
    7372 
    7473For people trying to catch up on the discussion, there are a few long threads in the django-developers archives. Two good places to start are probably [http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_frm/thread/17d1dfecd67864ab?q=autoescape& an early discussion here] and the discussion around [http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_frm/thread/7caeb86c04b81f10/9ea28abb20020437?lnk=gst&q=autoescape+willison&rnum=1#9ea28abb20020437  the original patch]. -- Malcolm.