| 3 | | |
| 4 | | However, I'm not sure I understand this last bit: |
| 5 | | |
| 6 | | Replying to [comment:53 Natalia Bidart]: |
| 7 | | > I believe this should still be considered a missing feature that requires proper documentation and tests, at least. I'm open to further evaluate a PR that would more officially document the cleanest "workaround" with some tests as an interim step. |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | Does it mean there would still be room in 5.2 for a PR (with tests and docs) whose production-code component is, essentially, the snippet I added above, to restore the 4.2 functionality? |