Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #8784, comment 19


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 5, 2012, 4:44:52 PM (12 years ago)
Author:
Henrique C. Alves

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #8784, comment 19

    initial v1  
    1 Ticket #19434 is related to this. The API doesn't accept aliases on methods (`filter()`, etc.), neither does it expose the `HAVING` clause. That means not only the API does not support aliases, it even goes the extra mile by not supporting a `HAVING` clause on `extra` either.
     1Ticket #19434 is related to this. The API doesn't accept aliases on methods (`filter()`, etc.), neither does it expose the `HAVING` clause. That means not only it makes it hard to use aliases, it even goes the extra mile by *keeping* you from writing `HAVING` clauses, and you are left high and dry in the ORM.
    22
    33Resorting `raw` is not a solution, since it's not functionally equivalent to `QuerySet` objects. The whole argument about not having SQL specific features on the ORM is moot too, since the only thing the ORM supports right now is SQL.
Back to Top