Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #37416, comment 6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 13, 2026, 12:10:09 AM (3 weeks ago)
Author:
Gavin Wahl

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #37416, comment 6

    initial v1  
    99
    1010I wouldn't want to recommend using CONCURRENTLY routinely because it can "fail but leave behind an “invalid” index. This index will be ignored for querying purposes because it might be incomplete; however it will still consume update overhead."
     11
     12The actual thing that's frustrating me here is that schema_editor opens its own atomic block, instead of having the caller wrap it if desired. I think this is required for some sqlite weirdness, but it'd be a lot more elegant if they were decoupled.
Back to Top