Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #36750, comment 27


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 25, 2026, 12:21:27 AM (12 days ago)
Author:
Simon Charette

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #36750, comment 27

    initial v1  
    33My comment:5 was just to point out to comment:4 that in comment:3 I suggested using the field referenced by the many-to-many field which is not necessarily the remote primary key.
    44
    5 The referenced field has to be unique as well and felt like a more ''natural'' default than necessarily picking the primary key but given this ticket main focus is making sure the output is deterministic primary is a good choice particularly given the detour we took with `sql.Query.totally_ordered` (thank you for tha btw).
     5The referenced field has to be unique as well and felt like a more ''natural'' default than necessarily picking the primary key but given this ticket main focus is making sure the output is deterministic defaulting to the primary key is a good choice particularly given the detour we took with `sql.Query.totally_ordered` (thank you for tha btw).
Back to Top