Changes between Initial Version and Version 2 of Ticket #36045


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 30, 2024, 1:50:37 PM (5 days ago)
Author:
Tim Graham
Comment:

Thanks for the proposal, however, I don't think we can accept it without a consensus on the Django Forum. As you note, there are a lot of open questions about how it could be implemented, so the design proposal would need to be solid. It's also unclear if it's a good idea to expose a database-specific feature like this that - as far as I'm aware - only applies to PostgreSQL. If you want to pursue this, I would try to implement it as a custom field so you can better understand what changes are required. Then, if you believe the changes should be incorporated in Django, make your proposal on the forum.

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #36045

    • Property Keywords postgres infinity datetime added
    • Property Resolutionwontfix
    • Property Status newclosed
  • Ticket #36045 – Description

    initial v2  
    2424**References:**
    2525
    26 [PostgreSQL Documentation on Infinity](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-DATETIME-SPECIAL-VALUES)
     26[https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-DATETIME-SPECIAL-VALUES) PostgreSQL Documentation on Infinity]
Back to Top