Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #36036, comment 19


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jan 15, 2025, 3:58:49 PM (3 weeks ago)
Author:
Andrew

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #36036, comment 19

    v1 v2  
    11I wanted to follow up with getting the separate PR approved to merge. We've been waiting on some input but not sure when we might expect to get final feedback. I'm happy to update however reviewers feel is best.
    22
    3 Additionally I've been struggling with the WKT writer to have it correctly write XYM coordinates. I'm wondering if it would be acceptable to have an initial PR merged that only supports the M dimension for 4D coordinates (XYZM). I'm fairly confidence the the primary use case for the M dimension will be for XYZM and XYM would be a relatively niche use case.
     3Additionally I've been struggling with the WKT writer to have it correctly write XYM coordinates. I'm wondering if it would be acceptable to have an initial PR merged that only supports the M dimension for 4D coordinates (XYZM). I'm fairly confident the the primary use case for the M dimension will be for XYZM and XYM would be a relatively niche use case.
    44
    55Thanks again for all y'alls guidance and input on this issue.
Back to Top